Im Rahmen der Bemühungen der NASA, einen Ersatzplan für den Mond zu finden – und den wilden Ideen, die Unternehmen vorbringen

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/01/science/nasa-moon-lunar-lander-options?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=missions&utm_source=reddit

    Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. A suggestion made last week by acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy that SpaceX could be booted from the agency’s upcoming moon-landing plans has rocked the space industry.

      Now, behind the scenes, pitches for alternate paths to the lunar surface are quietly starting to take shape.

      SpaceX currently has a $2.9 billion contract to prepare its gargantuan Starship rocket system to ferry astronauts to the moon’s surface as part of NASA’s Artemis III mission. However, citing delays in Starship’s development and competitive pressure from China, NASA asked SpaceX and Blue Origin — which holds a separate lunar lander contract with the space agency — to submit plans to expedite development of their respective spacecraft by October 29. Both companies have responded.

      But the space agency is also asking the broader commercial space industry to detail how they might get the job done more quickly, hinting that NASA leadership is prepared to sideline its current partners.

      CNN spoke with half a dozen companies about how they plan to respond to NASA’s call to action, which the agency will formally issue once the government shutdown ends, according to a source familiar with the matter.

    2. parkingviolation212 on

      Sure hope they’ve got the same urgency for the space suits we still don’t have.

    3. Tidalsky114 on

      Just build a bunch of rockets only designed to go one way. Launch them all to the moon loaded with everything needed to support life while someone can build a rocket to get back. I’m not sure how many people would have the intestinal fortitude for such an endeavor.

    4. TheCrazedTank on

      One small step of man, a giant leap down to your nearest Carl’s JR!

      We are never going back to the moon…

    5. OptimusSublime on

      You’re telling me fancy renderings that ignore all learned design and economics decisions from the last 60 years regarding going to other planets and moons didn’t actually translate into real viable engineering? Shocked. I’m shocked.

    6. FragrantExcitement on

      We don’t need a lander. Just put the astronauts in space suits and iron man them down. We can figure out how to get them home later.

    7. SRM_Thornfoot on

      We all know that Elon is just going to end up sending a flight to the Moon on his own, contract or no.

      The Superheavy lifter has already laid down a good track record. Starship testing has been primarily around the return and reusability of the heat tiles. You can pretty much mount whatever you want on top of the superheavy booster. A non-reusable lunar lander spaceship that docks back at the ISS for a transfer to a return capsule home might do the trick. Once in orbit refueling is solved, such a lander does not have to be throwaway, it could be reused for going back and forth from Earth orbit to Moon landings. The hard part is getting out of Earth’s atmosphere and into orbit and Elon already has that ability.

    8. BeerPoweredNonsense on

      So… if I may translate into plain English: there are 2 companies with contracts to build landers to go land on the moon. But they won’t be ready before the end of the current administration.

      So the orange baby has thrown his toys out of the pram.

      Does that sound about right?

    Leave A Reply