Share.

    24 Kommentare

    1. Massimo25ore on

      Italy will start studying the possibility of building the country’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in 2026. This project is an important step in modernizing Italy’s Navy and could place the country among a few nations that operate nuclear aircraft carriers.

      The project, known as Portaerei di Nuova Generazione, or New Generation Aircraft Carrier, will be developed under a long-term plan by the Italian Navy (Marina Militare) that extends to 2040.

      The concept envisions nuclear propulsion, electromagnetic catapults, advanced cyber-protected systems, and fully integrating manned and unmanned platforms.

      Aircraft carrier built for sixth-gen fighters
      Admiral Enrico Credendino, the Italian Navy’s chief of staff, confirmed earlier this year that the design phase for a nuclear-powered carrier is being evaluated as part of the Navy’s future force plan.

      “All new Italian naval vessels will be designed to integrate unmanned systems and enhanced cyber defense capabilities,” Credendino said.

      Fighter selection for the new carrier remains open, with options reportedly including the US-built F-35C, a future US Navy sixth-generation carrier jet, or a navalized trinational Global Combat Air Program (GCAP) variant.

      If realized, the carrier would complement Italy’s existing Cavour and Trieste carriers, which operate F-35B fighters.

      In 2026 will starts the studies of new Italian Navy aircraft carrier, know as „Portaerei di Nuova Generazione“ (New Gen Aircraft Carrier). From what know given by the Navy’s request, should be nuclear powered and maybe with EMALS system. The fighter’s choice will be interesting. pic.twitter.com/KfEvReUz0n

      — Ciro Nappi (@CiroNappi6) October 20, 2025
      The Cavour was commissioned in 2009, while the amphibious assault ship Trieste entered service in late 2024.

      Together, they provide the Navy with a dual-carrier capability for continuous operations and NATO interoperability.

      The feasibility studies will be conducted under the Minerva program, a €2.1 million research effort launched in 2023 by the Directorate of Naval Armaments.

      The program explores the use of compact naval reactors, each producing around 30 megawatts of thermal output, for submarines, destroyers, and potentially carriers.

      The consortium leading the effort includes Fincantieri, Cetena, Ansaldo Nucleare, Rina Services, and the University of Genoa.

      Fincantieri CEO Pierroberto Folgiero said the studies aim to ensure chemical and environmental safety, enabling nuclear-powered ships to dock in civilian ports.

      Nuclear propulsion, he added, would significantly enhance endurance, reduce fuel dependence, and support high-energy systems such as electromagnetic catapults (EMALS), directed-energy weapons, and next-generation radar systems.

    2. I remain intensely sceptical of this. Rather than a carrier-capable fighter they’re building a huge long range combat aircraft which won’t fit on a carrier (but will be able to dominate the central Med from Italy), and they currently quite underspend in comparison to the UK and France and Germany so it seems intensely unlikely they’re going to want to run multiple procurement projects that largely fill the same requirements. Italy’s really going to embark on a hugely expensive project for a carrier that – as far as I can tell – they don’t really need and that they’re not building appropriate aircraft for?

      ~~Where are they getting the escorts from anyway? Or is the idea that it will only ever operate with Cavour / Trieste?~~

      EDIT: OK it’s replacing Cavour, so their escort fleet is fine for that. Still though; sceptical.

    3. TheoryOfDevolution on

      World’s first? That sounds incredibly misleading.

      I can’t imagine the GCAP being able to take off this thing. For one thing, the GCAP is a 20 ton so navalizing it would be incredibly tricky. That only leaves the FCAS, if it even happens, or American.

    4. What’s with the headline? It’s not at all the world first nuclear aircraft carrier… it would be Italy’s first.

    5. insomnimax_99 on

      Uh, I can’t see a naval variant of Tempest being feasible – Tempest is gonna be huge, way to big for a carrier, and will need a massive runway (even taking into account a catapult and arrestor cables). Plus, it would need a load of structural reinforcement.

    6. Glass_Elevator5360 on

      English class one: Words „Could, Would, Should, May, Might“, are meaning NO!!!!!

    7. Beyllionaire on

      I give 0% credibility to this. Italy doesn’t even have a nuclear industry anymore and restarting one would cost more than the carrier itself. Also just the EMALS themselves cost as much as the LHD Trieste …

      If an EMALS equipped nuclear powered carrier is already a huge financial burden for France then it’s unaffordable for Italy which is in a worse financial state than France (if France reduces the deficit).

      To me it’s just wishful thinking from the Italian Navy. And last but not least, Italy has absolutely no need for such a carrier. Italy has no expeditionary ambitions or overseas territories and exclusive economic zones to protect. Their current duo is smart and no-nonsense: a light carrier and a flexible LHD.

      And this clickbait article is wrong anyway, it would not be the first, the US and China will take care of that.

    8. ExplosivePancake9 on

      So many people here have 0 idea of Italy’s budget, strategic plans, industrial capabilities and actual in service units.

    9. Would they really need it? Could they even support it? Like in terms of escort ships?

    10. Any-Lifeguard-2596 on

      Hahahaha ! Yes that’s the one that will defend Salvini’s Messina bridge against communists and atheists ! Getting used to find this type of #bullcrap on Reddit

    11. The title sounds incredibly hilarious. Nuclear carrier with 6th gen fighter, well, I would rather put my bet on US or China.

    12. So im gonna digress here a bit, but correct me if im wrong. Italy is in the midst of a deepening demographic crisis, no one can afford a home, but it is a good idea to invest in multi billion dollar military ships? Im not even against this to be clear, im just confused about where we’re going as a society with stuff like this

    13. A non conventional carrier capable of operating a navalised 6th gen aircraft (which are all going to be in the 20 to 25 ton range) would weigh at minimum 90,000 tons, be about over 350 m long, cost about 25 billion ( 2 times the MM’s annual budget) and require about 5000 personnel (about 30% of total MM’s man power). Apart from those ridiculous specifications there is only one drydock in Italy large enough to even accept such a ship and the project would require the development of an atomic powertrain witch Italy has never done plus the infrastructure to maintain it which would cost another 10 to 15 billion.

      Why Italy would even need a CATOBAR carrier is completely beyond me as its central position in the med mains it a can use a long range 6th gen fighter to dominate the sea with ease.

      It would literally be easier for Italy to put man on the moon that build this ship.

    14. SraminiElMejorBeaver on

      >navalized trinational Global Combat Air Program (GCAP) variant

      Let’s be clear, either a plane is navalized from the start, either it is not, eurofighter naval was bullshit, same as gripen navalized, none of those would have ever worked or it would just be a totally different plane with how heavy the modifications needed would be.

      You can have a plane that was made with carrier in mind be used without problems on grounds (see rafale, f18, f14…) but not the opposite.

      So the list of possible plane to field Italy’s nuclear carrier if it ever happened would include either f-35, f-47, Rafale or FCAS.

      >In parallel, Italy’s energy and defense giants, Enel, Ansaldo Energia, and Leonardo, established a joint venture called Nuclitalia in May 2025 to evaluate small modular reactor (SMR) technologies for civilian and military applications.

      >The company, chaired by former Politecnico di Milano rector Ferruccio Resta, will study mature SMR designs and assess co-production opportunities to strengthen domestic expertise in nuclear technology.then domestic expertise in nuclear technology.

      And the company that they wanted to count on [is broke and had nothing to show](https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/newcleo-allerta-revisori-continuita-aziendale-rischio-AHshuP3B?refresh_ce=1) even for the field of SMR while their supposed [tech that would be used for nuclear reactor relied on them](https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/fincantieri-mini-reattori-nucleari-bordo-navi-militari-ecco-cos-e-programma-minerva-AGfX26TD).

    15. CrystallAngel on

      If true, this’d put Italy ahead of everyone in carrier tech that’s a big move for Europe

    16. Does Italy even _need_ Carriers? It sits right in the middle of the Mediterranean, and has two unsinkable airbases throughout (Sicily + Sardinia).

      Better fit would be France getting a 2nd CDG Carrier

    Leave A Reply