Die NATO fängt in drei Tagen das dritte russische Spionageflugzeug mit ausgeschaltetem Transponder ab
https://www.newsweek.com/nato-intercepts-third-russian-spy-plane-with-transponder-off-in-3-days-10972781
Die NATO fängt in drei Tagen das dritte russische Spionageflugzeug mit ausgeschaltetem Transponder ab
https://www.newsweek.com/nato-intercepts-third-russian-spy-plane-with-transponder-off-in-3-days-10972781
9 Kommentare
Question is if a small missile will stop them shutting off the transponder.
They are probably testing NATO’s detection and reaction time capabilities.
Interesting to know that the Geneva Conventions allows disabling IFF transponder as a ruse of war as long it’s not perfidy ([Article 37 of Additional Protocol I](https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-37): an act that betrays protected status, for example, a perfidy in this context would be to turns off the IFF transponder and mimics the electronic profiles and flight behavior of a civilian medical evacuation aircraft, or broadcasts a false transponder code identifying it as such, so we refrain to attacking and once it’s close enough, the disguised jet launches weapons against us).
Edit: added the ref to the article
what happened to the EU/NATO about the „you are on notice that any further incursions will be shot down“?
Transponders off cus the planes broken and they don’t have parts. /s maybe
Just shoot em down no transponder no proof of destruction
I mean it wouldn’t be a very effective spy plane with the transporter turned on.
ruzzia: You shot down our plane!
NATO: According to flight data there was no plane.
ruzzia: Oh
Maybe time to warn Russia that next time their planes will be shut down.
A spy plane with it’s transponder off? No way