Vielen Dank an alle Leute, die sich ständig über die Regierung wegen ihrer Kürzungen beschweren. Orpo und Co. haben beschlossen, dass wir die gesamte Kommunikation aller Ministerien zentralisieren müssen (die, wenn ich mich erinnern darf, den Menschen und nicht den politischen Parteien dienen sollen) und unter die Kontrolle des Premierministers gestellt werden, mit dem Ziel, die „positiven Auswirkungen“ der von der Regierung beschlossenen Strukturreformen hervorzuheben 🙃
Abgesehen vom Sarkasmus ist der Konsolidierungsprozess bereits im Gange und dies ist nur ein Leitartikel von HS, in dem die Richtung kritisiert wird, in die sich die Regierung bewegt. Es gab bereits Bestrebungen von Mitgliedern der Regierungspartei, einzuschränken, was die Ministerien sagen dürfen und was nicht. Ex-Mutter des Monats, Kaisa Juuso, wollte nicht, dass Mitarbeiter des Sozial- und Gesundheitsministeriums Interviews geben, zu denen sie eigentlich als Beamte verpflichtet sind. Quelle
https://www.hs.fi/paakirjoitukset/art-2000011592103.html
Von IsopodMysterious9125
2 Kommentare
Under [Finland’s new law](https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/KasittelytiedotValtiopaivaasia/Sivut/HE_147+2022.aspx), private sector entities employing at least 250 people and public sector entities with at least 50 employees were required to establish an internal reporting channel by 01 April 2023. Private sector entities with between 50 and 250 employees were given an extended deadline of 17 December 2023 to comply with the new requirements. Similarly, organisations with fewer than 50 employees who voluntarily established an internal reporting channel must bring it into compliance with the new legislation by the same date.
The personal scope of the Whistleblowing Law in Finland goes beyond the whistleblower and takes into account individuals such as board members, volunteers, unpaid trainees, shareholders and job applicants. Receipt of a report must be acknowledged within seven days while feedback on any action taken has to be provided to the whistleblower within three months. If the whistleblower reasonably concludes that the employer’s actions were insufficient or the feedback provided is satisfactory, he or she is entitled to protection at the organisation’s expense. In such a scenario in Finland, the whistleblower can also decide to report via a public channel through The Chancellor of Justice’s Office or later to the general public.
Finland’s law does not require private employers to [implement anonymous reporting](https://www.integrityline.com/expertise/blog/anonymous-reporting/) but many organisations will likely offer this option in practice. Even if an organisation decides against anonymous reports, the law still recommends establishing such a channel given that it can prove useful for communication with the anonymous whistleblower.
Under the new legislation, whistleblower reports must be exclusively processed by appointed persons who are appropriately trained in a qualified case management system. Processing of reports can be outsourced, given that the body responsible adheres to the GDPR and relevant national regulations. While the new law allows for group implementation, it falls short when it comes to intragroup whistleblowing solutions in areas such as data transfer and liability allocation. [https://www.integrityline.com/expertise/blog/finland-passes-eu-whistleblowing-directive/](https://www.integrityline.com/expertise/blog/finland-passes-eu-whistleblowing-directive/)
FUCK ORPO and those enabling them.
Russian bot alert