Rot und Blau haben gleich viele Menschen
Von Negative-Swan7993
Rot und Blau haben gleich viele Menschen
Von Negative-Swan7993
18 Kommentare
terrifying
Isnt Mercator also artifially making the difference larger?
I mean, OK?
Is this one of those optical illusions?
Bihar (130 million), West Bengal (104 million) and Bangladesh (170 million) combined already exceeds the population of US+Canada (370 million).
Gangetic plains are some of the most fertile lands in the world, inhabited by people for thousands of years. Of course it has more people than deserts, rainforests, tundra and mountains.
Ahh yes the blue which has large swathes of Siberia, The Canadian Wilderness, the Amazon, the Sahara desert, the Australian outback, the Jungles of Southern Africa, Tierra Del Fuego and Rubʿ al-Khali meaning the Empty Quarter being the largest continuous sand desert in the world combined is smaller than the red. The red which includes one of the densest assortment of people in one of the more fertile lands, the Ganges Delta.
hmm yes areas with low population
You chose like some of the most uninhabited places for the blue to the point to where this map almost feels satire
And that number is . . . .?
Region shaded in light blue has the least number of people 😂
Ban
Mommy, daddy, it’s my turn to post a bullshit map comparing uninhabitable places to one of the most fertile deltas on earth.
Also, don’t go there.
Proof that population isn’t the key to economics
Wow, I can’t believe enough people live in those blue wastelands to equal the population of a country located in a fertile delta like Bangladesh. It’s crazy to think so many people live in such extreme environments!
Also the light blue.
Map of mountains and deserts sweet
What? People aren’t living in massive rain forests, deserts and tundra? Woooooow