Trump unterstützt Putins Herangehensweise an die Macht – Großbritannien und Europa können ihn nicht aufhalten

Earlier this week, as Russian missiles and drones continued to rain down on Ukrainian cities, Sergei Naryshkin, the director of [Russia’s](https://inews.co.uk/topic/russia?ico=in-line_link) foreign intelligence service, struck an uncompromising tone.

Without evidence, he claimed [Nato’s](https://inews.co.uk/topic/nato?ico=in-line_link) “Russophobic” European members were preparing for war with Russia. The UK, he said, was preparing for sabotage in the Baltic and Black seas and was behind “terrorist operations and military strikes” on Russian territory via its “Ukrainian proxies”.

Compromise – naturally on Russian terms – was required “to avoid a new global conflict”, he said.

Beyond his doom-laden conspiracy prattle, Naryshkin was right on one point: the world order in place since 1945 is in flux and there is a [“fierce struggle” between the largest centres of global power](https://inews.co.uk/news/trump-putin-xi-world-control-3861766?srsltid=AfmBOopKNgbzdseppeacl9US7Xn0BLFTPuTz2JZey41tFch455mNuAFm&ico=in-line_link) to define its future.

As I saw for myself in Moscow [when Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine](https://inews.co.uk/news/world/russia-when-invade-ukraine-2022-why-putin-started-war-timeline-conflict-2160097?ico=in-line_link) over three years ago, [Vladimir Putin’s](https://inews.co.uk/topic/vladimir-putin?ico=in-line_link) preferred future is one based upon the pursuit of power, disregard for treaties, and the crude principle that might is right.

International journalists, especially from the UK, are really churning out these „Trump bad“ articles at an insane pace. I guess it’s an easy way to generate content without really saying anything of meaning.