Wertlos? Der Abgeordnete von Sudbury kontert die Ablehnung von Poilievres Critical Minerals Strategy
https://www.sudbury.com/local-news/worthless-sudbury-mp-counters-poilievres-critical-minerals-strategy-dismissal-11366180
Wertlos? Der Abgeordnete von Sudbury kontert die Ablehnung von Poilievres Critical Minerals Strategy
https://www.sudbury.com/local-news/worthless-sudbury-mp-counters-poilievres-critical-minerals-strategy-dismissal-11366180
2 Kommentare
This idea that everything would be better if people just „got out of the way“ and let miners mine is so incorrect it is almost malicious.
To become a force in critical minerals requires generational investment. Probably in the scale of trillions of dollars. It requires a complete rework of our industrial capabilities and capacities. It requires a reworking of our educational priorities. Profitability would probably be over a decade and a half away.
I don’t believe anyone has the stomach for the kind of shift that this strategy would truly require. What Carney is doing, is if anything, grossly insufficient.
Even if something is good for Canada as a whole, Poilievre and the current crop of Conservatives will attack it as „worthless“ EVEN IF it might be beneficial for regions with many Conservative voters.
If it was designed by the Liberals, it’s „worthless“.
If it was thought of by the Conservatives but implemented by the Liberals, it’s „worthless“.
If it was implemented by the Conservatives in the past and now supported by the Liberals, it’s also „worthless“.
And ESPECIALLY if something is beneficial to Ontario and/or Quebec, then it’s definitely „worthless“.
Poilievre is the perfect example of „all foam and no ale“!