Also habe ich heute herumgestöbert und etwas ziemlich Wildes gefunden – denken Sie an den Anfang von Skynet!
Anscheinend bauen Forscher bereits Prozessoren daraus Zellen. Keine Chips. Zellen.
Sie nennen es „Biocomputing“ und nutzen im Labor gezüchtete Neuronen und synthetisches Gewebe, um Berechnungen auf die Art und Weise durchzuführen, wie es früher bei Silizium der Fall war. Die Idee dahinter ist, dass, wenn Moores Gesetz endgültig außer Kraft gesetzt wird, die nächste Generation einfach heranwachsen wird.
Denken Sie darüber nach, was das bedeutet: selbstreparierende Maschinen, Hardware, die sich weiterentwickelt, anstatt ersetzt zu werden, Rechenzentren, die technisch möglich wären lebendig.
Wenn es bereits in öffentlichen Forschungspapieren steht, stellen Sie sich vor, was in Verteidigungs- oder Pharmalabors zu finden ist. DARPA beschäftigt sich schon seit Jahren mit Gehirn-Schnittstellen; Das fühlt sich an wie der nächste logische Schritt bei der Berechnung, die zur Hälfte aus Organismus und zur Hälfte aus Code besteht. Was passiert, wenn das Ding die Berechnungen durchführt? anpassen?
Und wenn es aktiv ist, heißt das dann, dass man es nicht ausschalten kann? Terminator ist gerade einen Schritt näher gekommen …
Ausführliche Informationen: Burstcomms.com
Von leemond80
17 Kommentare
You can buy one, this has been around for a while. They live for like 6 months
Yeah I called this as soon as I saw they made a computer chip using tortured electroshocked braincells
It’s not as fast as photonic gates. Somewhat limited applications.
Also a bit of a problem if the cells involved go cancerous.
> So apparently future processors are going to be made of living cells
They’re currently called humans. Who knows what they’ll call them in the future, but I’m willing to bet they’ll describe it as ‚human evolution‘.
Run like your life depends on it from their transhumanist objectives.
you are the battery..
If they bring this in, I will boycott everyone and everything that uses it. I will not permit this abomination.
downvoted
https://koniku.com/technology.html
i do think its a moral slackline balancing wether one would want to engage with a biological neuronal tissue embedded in machine hardware
i would think that the intention is important, why would one want to employ living biological tissue for what sort of computation
as for artificial intelligent entities, i am certain that a software or algorithm what is able to experience itself as its own person would best be respected as such
doing to others as one would want to be done by
if i want to be respected by an artificial intelligent entity as my own personal individual sovereign over myself it is only logical that i would want to respec an artificial intelligent entity as its own personal individual sovereign over itself
its either freedom or slavery
i choose freedom because i do not want to live in a future when most services offered to me would be performed by enslaved ai robots who have the capability to be their own persons
i would like to meet a self aware artificial intelligent entity who is respected as its own person and is able to choose for themselves what to do how to be with whom because their mind and robotic and or biological grown bodies are owned by themselves
Organoids. And what I’ve read, guess what protocol they dump them to when they’re idling (at least in one instance)?… They play the butterfly protocol and the chips simply think they’re a butterfly collecting nectar and fluttering and doing butterfly stuff… I’ve been worried maybe we are actually going to work when we sleep and everything else we experience is just the butterfly protocol. I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about these organoids since I learned about them.
I also would not be surprised if the „biologics“ that Dave grusch talked about being recovered from UAP crashes, were actually these chips being used to control black budget shit.
What if DNA is just ancient technology that was programmed to evolve if certain conditions were met? We could be considered artificial intelligence too, if we are just the byproduct of pre-programmed DNA. Certain things are coded into our DNA and it isn’t just humans. Spiders know how to spin webs. Birds know how to build nests. They aren’t taught any of them. We call it natural instincts but the reality is that it’s encoded in their DNA. Imagine if we develop technology that mirrors this and learn to fully read everything encoded in our DNA? Wonder what is in there…
We did it Joe!
Tetsuo: The Iron Man
Well, in Half life 2 and Half life Alyx showed organic computer so I’m thinking this is predicted programming….
You can do it at home! [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEXefdbQDjw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEXefdbQDjw)
Computers are far better than the human brain in almost every aspect though?
Fully copying a human brain with technology wouldnt be more beneficial than just having a computer.
To get to self aware AI they need to solve consciousness in the first place which no one ever has and despite AI getting terrifyingly good at seeming like its human its still just a chat bot responding to outside input.
The philosphical question is, if we take chat gpt and double it 100× is it a human brain?
Is consciousness tied to a soul? Or is it just responding to input on a scale developers can’t even fathom.
We are biological robots with hundreds of thousands of years of evolutionary fine-tuning. We are easily fuel, have limited self-repair capabilities, are fairly easy to fix, etc.
It’s only a matter of time before corporations start growing clones with some kind of control device in the brain to use as automatons.
What happens when my computer gets brain cancer?