Share.

    25 Kommentare

    1. Affectionate_Cat293 on

      Its dual dependence on America’s digital services and Beijing’s critical mineral processing industry leaves it highly vulnerable

      The writer is rector of the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna

      Tech wars between west and east are nothing new. During the cold war, the US and its allies competed fiercely with the Soviet Union in space exploration and weapons systems. More recently, competition between the US and China has been heating up. Ironically, this time Europe stands to be the biggest loser.

      The US and its allies founded the Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls in 1949 to prevent the eastern bloc gaining access to western technology that might enhance its military and economic capability. The committee’s impact increased significantly under President Ronald Reagan with a ban on the sale of microprocessors, computers and oil extraction technology to Warsaw Pact countries. From the late 1970s, western technological advances created an unbridgeable strategic gap, helping to speed the collapse of the Soviet Union.

      The last three US administrations have followed a similar strategy against China, curbing the export of high-end microchips and the machines that make them. But unlike the Soviet Union, China can fight back by imposing controls on rare earths and mineral processing technology. Last week, Beijing expanded controls to 12 of the 17 rare earth metals, claiming this was “to safeguard national security interests”.

      Until the inauguration of President Donald Trump, both Europe and the US emphasised the importance of critical minerals for promoting the green energy transition. Now, another sector is expressing concern at the Chinese move; defence industries in the west are fretting. Whether in drone, tank, submarine or missile technology, China has a firm grip on the supply of many key components necessary for their production.

      In the first week of the Iran-Israel conflict in June this year, approximately 800 missiles were exchanged. Each contained anywhere between two and 20 kilogrammes of rare earth elements, including two, dysprosium and terbium, now subject to Chinese export controls. Based on conservative estimates from the limited data, this means anywhere between 1.6 and 16 metric tonnes of rare earth elements were vaporised in that conflict in seven days.

      Ukraine’s extraordinary recent performance in its drone war against the Russian invasion is almost entirely dependent on electronics and magnets imported from China. Ukraine is now less concerned about whether European arms deliveries will arrive on time and more worried about the flow of tech imports from China.

      In the past 30 years, China has become the world leader in the processing of most of the 54 raw minerals that the US Geological Survey classifies as critical for US industry, including the defence sector. Currently the Chinese can process virtually any mineral 30 per cent more cheaply than its competitors. To compete with this, western governments would need to offer subsidies to their own industry. While China leverages its rare earth monopoly, Washington is using its influence to limit China’s access to the most powerful microprocessors (although the great majority are physically produced by TSMC in Taiwan).

    2. JazzlikeAmphibian9 on

      There is plenty of this stuff in the ground. Europe needs to be self sufficient when it comes to this type of stuff since it is such a critical commodity these days.

      Refining of this stuff is dirty but so what if we can’t defend our self’s what does our other goals matter ?

      We are clearly heading towards a Multi polar world where international law won’t matter it will be the cold war allover again then it would be nice if Europe could at least be the bastion of Democracy. So yeah this type of stuff needs to have a high priority.

    3. Hour_Raisin_4547 on

      Didn’t Norway discover a massive deposit a few years ago? One so large that it was guaranteed to end any European dependence on foreign rare earth materials?

      What happened with that?

    4. Present_Student4891 on

      Europe’s getting squeezed militarily by Russia, economically by China, and entrepreneurially by the U.S. Europe needs a drastic overhaul to compete in the future or it risks becoming an Argentina. Once prosperous but now no more.

    5. KillerSnailExtreme on

      Narsaq, Greenland is one of the richest mineral places on earth. That’s why Trump wants Greenland.

    6. Fun fact, Europe has one of the only (only?) refineries outside of China that can produce all rare earth metals, they just expanded this year.

      [Solvay plant in La Rochelle, France](https://www.solvay.com/en/press-release/solvay-advances-european-rare-earths-production-through-capacity-expansion)

      **Edit:** Also a canadian company (with the help of the EU) just opened a new rare-earth magnet factory in Estonia which can supply a shitton of our own magnets ([*“In Estonia, a new rare-earth magnet plant powers Europe’s green transition*“](https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/09/15/in-estonia-a-new-rare-earth-magnet-plant-powers-europes-green-transition))

      **Edit 2:** Another refinery is being build in France, operational in 2026, for heavy rare earth metals. [„Caremag project aims to supply 15% of the global market“](https://mine.nridigital.com/mine_jun25/caremag-project-ree)

    7. Embarrassed-Fault973 on

      Europe has access to deposits of many of these things but extracting them is often an ugly, dirty, messy business. We’ve gotten very used to importing cheap mineral resources often at very high environmental and human rights costs, from developing countries, while pushing uglier industries out of our own backyard. Politically we’re not really prepared to look at that. We just like the products and turn a blind eye to the supply chain. Ultimately that has a cost.

      We’ve also done the same with things like the chemical industries. A lot of the riskier and more polluting operations were encouraged to move elsewhere, while we didn’t really clean up or place any obligations on supply chains to really respect environmental standards. So the costs were kept down by just moving to avoid the regulations and find lower costs.

      The net result of that is that we’ve now got dependencies on China and India for large swathes of manufacturing, while we were cherry picking high end stuff, assuming that they wouldn’t compete. They are now competing and often outcompeting in areas like automotive and advanced engineering and technology products.

      The U.S. is taking the approach of trying to roll back the clock and the regulations, which will do them huge damage – brining back terrible industrial practices and so on.

      The alternative is to do a lot of these things, but do them cleaner, greener and more heavily automated. Europe could do more of this but hasn’t been doing so.

    8. Jaimalaugenou on

      Europe is the biggest loser in/for/about [wathever you want to insert]

    9. new_accnt1234 on

      Europe could focus on greenland, there are reasons why trump wanted it

    10. GrandBoot4881 on

      Is there a war going on? Well, Europe has possiblities to go out off China, including their plastic gadjets. Does China have them too ? I would not mind having less junk on sale.

    11. Efficient_Image_4554 on

      The correct sentence: „AGAIN Europe is the biggest loser in any US-…….. wars“

    12. OkKnowledge2064 on

      Things have to get a lot worse in europe for the average guy to understand that we might need to fuck up our environment in some places to survive

    13. 1. Kill import costs of chinese BEVs

      2. Buy chinese BEVs and drive till death.

      3. Recycle batteries in Europe

      4. Use recyceld rare earth for european usecases

      /S for those who took it seriously

    14. Emergency_Link7328 on

      American press. Totally unbiased.

      Newsflash: Europe has more rare earth refining capacity than the US, including the only facility outside China capable of refining all the rare earth materials.

      American propaganda shitting on Europe, as usual.

    15. Of course we are, like in every other field imaginable. I‘m so sick and tired of the EU playing small in every single field, of acting cowardly. Whether that‘s diplomatically, geopolitically or military wise. Stand the f*** up and grow a backbone. In general, I expect the EU to grow a pair, create one military, one army and make sure our interests are taken care of. If necessary, use the military to enforce our interests.

    16. Affectionate-Arm-688 on

      Sadly, I don’t think either side care. Europe has fallen quite far from it’s glory days.

    17. pouetpouetcamion2 on

      c est parce que l europe n a pas les bonnes priorités ou que ses dirrigeants nous sabordent volontairement. une lecon de géographie et de géologie pour ces dirrigeants aurait été intéressante dans leurs longues études.

      apres ca n est pas comme s ils avaient acces aux meilleurs experts du continents et comme si les cabinets de conseil n etaient pas payés grassement, si? on a des poissons qui jouent au go. d autre part l exploitation miniere a un cout en termes de nature. cout qu on oublie.

    18. Hughley_N_Dowd on

      If there only was a way to extract that stuff closer to home. Like the absolutely massive deposits in Sweden and Norway…

    Leave A Reply