Milliarden an privaten Geldern fließen in die Fusionsenergie. Wird es sich auszahlen? – Einige Unternehmen machen inzwischen ehrgeizige Behauptungen, dass sie innerhalb weniger Jahre mit der kommerziellen Stromversorgung beginnen wollen.

    https://theconversation.com/billions-in-private-cash-is-flooding-into-fusion-power-will-it-pay-off-266354

    Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. From the article

      Why has this happened? There are several drivers: increasing urgency for carbon-free power, advances in technology and understanding such as new materials and control methods using artificial intelligence (AI), a growing ecosystem of private-sector companies, and a wave of capital from tech billionaires. This comes on the back of demonstrated progress in theory and experiments in fusion science.

      Also from the article

      One such design is the privately owned Commonwealth Fusion System’s [SPARC tokamak](https://cfs.energy/technology/sparc), which has attracted some US$3 billion in investment. SPARC was designed using sophisticated simulations of how plasma behaves, many of which now use AI to speed up calculations. AI may also be used to control the plasma during operations.

      Another company, Type I Energy, is pursuing [a design called a stellarator](https://typeoneenergy.com/our-technology/), which uses a complex asymmetric system of coils to produce a twisted magnetic field. In addition to high-temperature superconductors and advanced manufacturing techniques, Type I Energy uses high-performance computing to optimally design machines for maximum performance.

      [Both](https://news.mit.edu/2024/commonwealth-fusion-systems-unveils-worlds-first-fusion-power-plant-1217) %5Bcompanies%5D(https://spectrum.ieee.org/stellarator) claim they will roll out commercial fusion power by the mid-2030s.

      In the United Kingdom, a government-sponsored industry partnership is pursuing the [Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production](https://stepfusion.com/what-is-step/), a prototype fusion pilot plant proposed for completion by 2040.

    2. Compared to the AI bubble this is chump change. How much is going to be spent by private companies trying to colonise off world in the same time window?

      It’s literally a side bet to the people putting the money in.

    3. Alexpander4 on

      Fusion power is not an answer.

      Firstly, it ain’t happening. Edit: fusion power has been „just a couple of years away“ since the 70s

      Secondly, our freshwater supplies are already strained by corporate bullshit like crypto and AI datacentres, and we can’t drink helium.

      Fusion is useful to a society that deserves it, but for our greed-driven exploitative system, it’s just the fossil fuels of tomorrow.

    4. „Some companies are now making ~~aggressive~~ ***unrealistic*** claims…“

    5. Build better AI, and it will take us into the future for sure. I think AGI goal is a better investment. Only which AI company will succeed, that’s the real gamble. Good ole capitalism will someday take us into true communism. I can’t wait!!!

    6. i have been trained for 40 years to dismiss such claims as BS. Which is sad.

    Leave A Reply