Wir haben jetzt solide Beweise dafür, dass nach Trump und dem Projekt 2025 die Zukunft der Republikanischen Partei im Nationalsozialismus liegt

Nah, nah. They were just joking around. It’s all a big laugh don’t you see?

„America First“ was originally a slogan of pro-Nazi Americans. Total coincidence, I’m sure.

We’ll see how happy they are with their choices when the whole american economic system just completely collapses.

And past and present. 

People assaulting the capitol wearing shirts that said “Six million wasn’t enough” didn’t tip this off?

(Or you know, everything over the last 60 years. Surely there were no signs.)

The *sole* value of conservatism is respect for and obedience to [one’s perception of] traditionally established hierarchy, and hierarchy dictates that those on top (in-groups) are rightfully idolized and receive privileges, credibility, and resources, while those on the bottom (out-groups) are demonized/dehumanized and/or bound by restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources.

To them, the second-greatest injustice imaginable is for those [they perceive to be] on the bottom [of social hierarchy] to have access to the rights, credibility, and resources reserved for those on top. The first greatest injustice is for those on top to be bound by the restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources reserved for those on the bottom.

When conservatives feel that society has *progressed too far* — in other words, those traditionally on the lower echelons of [social] hierarchy being accepted and given rights, credibility, and resources reserved for those above their station; and/or those traditionally on the upper echelons being questioned and bound by the restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources reserved for those below their station — they will relinquish the „preferring gradual development to abrupt change“ and „social stability“ parts, and hearken and appeal to traditional hierarchical institutions. Nationalism and racism are the go-to institutions for such, though sex[ual preference/identity] — those who don’t conform to traditional gender roles/norms/appearances/attitudes — is also popular; they will demand strict stratification of society and social hierarchy where in-groups and out-groups are clearly defined, where some people are „less people“ than others. The former — by nature — will shrink as less and less people will be found to be „pure“, and virtually everyone is considered „less people“ (with significantly fewer rights, credibility, and resources) when compared to the leader at the apex. This is known as [fascism](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism), which is the end result of conservatism.

„Know your place“ is their mantra. 

Mark my words. After the Epstein files are released, the entire right will begin a massive conversation about the age of consent.

They will all reveal themselves as pedophiles and begin to normalize it.

Call me crazy, but I didn’t need it to be implemented to know it was Nazism. I’m fairly sure my posts a year ago detail how I, and others who read it and have a working brain, called it Nazism or „Nazi shit“ I believe was the preferred term.

Instead of MAGA condemning it, they’re attacking the messengers or shifting the argument. It won’t be long until they bring back the „maybe Hitler wasn’t that bad“ argument soon

Um, we told you so. So many times.

I don’t know why they aren’t referred to as the klan anymore. They are American with a long history and they have evolved and gone more mainstream but they are a bunch of klansmen.

When Elon did his Nazi salute, we knew then.

I understand why this is different from a news media perspective, primarily because it shatters “plausible deniability” and it makes a direct connection to the Republican Party, but this shit has been openly plastered all over Facebook, Twitter, news media comment sections, YouTube comments, you name it, for as long as Trump has been around and it has largely been ignored and dismissed.

Is this the right time to say „we told you so?“

Or should we wait til our heads are being shaved in the prison camps?

Solid proof?

Holy crap it could not have been more obvious that the fat orange Temu shitler and his nutty cult are hitting all the boxes in the fascism playbook specifically the Nazi one. And have been since his first term.

I just don’t understand why most Americans are so naive to this and think it’s exaggerated or hyperbole. They really need to learn what actually went down in a slow creep in Nazi germany. Because America is on that path right now as we speak.

We had that „solid“ proof a long

long time ago

you fucking knobs.

We all kinda knew that. Look at Chicago.

I posted this in another thread, but it’s worth sharing again: [Here’s how Oxford’s dictionary of politics and international relations (2018) defines fascism.](https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199670840.001.0001/acref-9780199670840-e-465?rskey=VlbULt&result=558) Keep in mind that it’s largely unchanged from their 2008 edition – well before Trump was first in office, and thus demonstrably uninfluenced by contemporary US politics. Also, [here’s a screenshot](https://imgur.com/a/EZ5Qydl) of the full page so you can see what words I removed.

>A right‐wing nationalist ideology or movement with a totalitarian and hierarchical structure that is fundamentally opposed to democracy and liberalism. […]

>Genuinely fascist ideologies are: monist, that is to say, based upon the notion that there are fundamental and basic truths about humanity and the environment which do not admit to question; simplistic, in the sense of ascribing complex phenomena to single causes and advancing single remedies; fundamentalist, that is, involving a division of the world into ‘good’ and ‘bad’ with nothing in between; and conspiratorial, that is, predicated on the existence of a secret world‐wide conspiracy by a hostile group seeking to manipulate the masses to achieve and/or maintain a dominant position.

>In content, these ideologies are distinguished by five main components:

>(1) extreme nationalism, the belief that there is a clearly defined nation which has its own distinctive characteristics, culture, and interests, and which is superior to others;

>(2) an assertion of national decline—that at some point in the mythical past the nation was great, with harmonious social and political relationships, and dominant over others, and that subsequently it has disintegrated, become internally fractious and divided, and subordinate to lesser nations;

>(3) this process of national decline is often linked to a diminution of the racial purity of the nation—in some movements the nation is regarded as co‐extensive with the race (the nation race), while in others, hierarchies of races are defined generically with nations located within them (the race nation), but in virtually all cases, the view is taken that the introduction of impurities has weakened the nation and been responsible for its plight;

>(4) the blame for national decline and/or racial miscegenation is laid at the door of a conspiracy on the part of other nations/races seen as competing in a desperate struggle for dominance;

>(5) in that struggle, both capitalism and its political form, liberal democracy, are seen as mere divisive devices designed to fragment the nation and subordinate it further in the world order.

>With regard to prescriptive content, the first priority is the reconstitution of the nation as an entity by restoring its purity. The second is to restore national dominance by reorganizing the polity, the economy, and society. Means to this end include variously:

>(1) the institution of an authoritarian and antiliberal state dominated by a single party;

>(2) total control by the latter over political aggregation, communication, and socialization;

>(3) direction by the state of labour and consumption to create a productionist and self‐sufficient economy; and

>(4) a charismatic leader embodying the ‘real’ interests of the nation and energizing the masses. With these priorities fulfilled, the nation would then be in a position to recapture its dominance, if necessary by military means.

>Such priorities were explicit in the inter‐war fascist movements, which indulged in racial/ethnic ‘cleansing’, established totalitarian political systems, productionist economies, and dictatorships, and of course went to war in pursuit of international dominance.

>But such parties can no longer openly espouse these extremes, and national/racial purity now takes the form of opposition to continuing immigration and demands for repatriation; totalitarianism and dictatorship have been replaced by lesser demands for a significant strengthening in the authority of the state, allegedly within a democratic framework; productionism has become interventionism; and military glory has been largely eschewed.

*The GOP is Nazism.

What do you mean „the future“ ?
The gestapo is already disaperaing people in concentration camps and they already declared the Antifaschistische Aktion were terrorists for fuck’s sake !
Miller’s speech at Kirk’s memorial was a Goebels speech verbatim; what else did you need ?

We knew that since his fucking 2016 campaign and no one in the independents or the right would listen…..