Journalisten könnten als „Sicherheitsrisiko“ eingestuft werden, wenn sie etwas veröffentlichen, das nicht offiziell vom Verteidigungsministerium genehmigt ist. Verstehen Sie, dass damit jeder Journalist gemeint ist, sogar ein Unabhängiger.

    Von a_human-being

    Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. a_human-being on

      SS:

      So, while legally a journalist cannot be jailed simply for being labeled a “security risk,” in practice, that label could pave the path for more severe treatment, it could serve as a bureaucratic bridge toward treating a journalist as an enemy actor or domestic threat.
      Something to think about.

    2. This is a blatant, full frontal assault on the First Amendment. Only Fascists try shit like this.

    3. Lumpy-Marsupial-6617 on

      Because I have an expose that’ll expose the entire farce of surveillance state and what they actually use it for.

      It’s an intimidation game for sure.

    4. PatTheCatMcDonald on

      Coming from ‚Signalgate‘ Smegbreath, I find it funny that he is such a hypocrite BS merchant like his crime boss.

    5. Jerry_Loler on

      Thank God every single news outlet (except OAN) told the Pentagon to go F off and refused to accept these new standards. Now let’s see if Hegseth has the balls to hold a press conference to an empty room. And after spending all those millions of dollars on his new makeup closet.

    Leave A Reply