Candace Owens: Das Oberste Gericht Australiens unterstützt die Entscheidung der Regierung, US-Rechtsaußen das Visum zu verweigern
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/15/candace-owens-australia-visa-high-court-backs-government-decision-deny
42 Kommentare
Sorry to bother you with our bullshit Australia
Damn. We don’t want her, either.
>*…did not pass the “character test” to receive a visa under the Migration Act*
She spreads too much hate to enter their country. That’s almost impressive in a sick way.
You shall not pass!
I understand the decision. If you’d reconsider letting her visit and then keeping her, a lot of us would appreciate it.
I’m sure the aussies have enough right wingers already. Can’t we all send our MAGA and MAGA equivalents to Russia so they can be enlisted to fight drones in Ukraine ?
Suck shit
Didn’t Marco say the same thing about denying visa to people that want to be political? It’s a privilege, not a right from what he said.
Owens and Team: we argue that your laws are wrong, they’re too broad so they can be used to exclude anyone you don’t like! So mean!
Entire High Court, unanimously: Yeah, nah.
Cracking job everyone. Take the day, go to the pub. You’ve earned it.
It’s kind of interesting because on one hand, she’ll trumpet that it is an infringement on freedom of speech but have no qualms about shutting down things like Drag Story Time.
She’s probably the only cunt not allowed in Australia
Respect for Australia
More countries need to do this.
Sorry to waste your time with our trash, Australia
She said that Australia was a tyrannical state and asked for the US to invade Australia.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/22/rightwing-us-pundit-candace-owens-compares-australian-government-to-the-taliban-calling-it-a-tyrannical-police-state-
So yeah, not really a good idea to allow her into the country and spout even more bullshit and make a profit off of it.
Tbh Candace Owens is less a „right winger“ and more so completely insane. she started out far-right and how she’s like the crown of horseshoe theory. She’ll take anything insane and run with it
Wasn’t she already a pretty terrible human being long before the current political environment?
Like, why does she even want to go? There is no reason for her to go down there and meddle with the Australian populace 😂
Candace owens helped get us here.
Bloody good job too.
Canadian here, Fuck’n eh buds good on ya.
Now if we could block her from coming back home.
Didn’t she have a psychotic break on a podcast recently?
Yeah. Don’t let these Fifth Columnists in!
Hahahahhaafuckherhahahahhaha
Good job Australia!!!
>Burke said at the time the US conservative influencer and podcast host, who has advanced conspiracy theories and antisemitic rhetoric – including allegedly minimising Nazi medical experiments in concentration camps – did not pass the “character test” to receive a visa under the Migration Act.
By the transitive property, millions of her devoted MAGA followers also fail the character test.
Australia’s courts seem pretty adept at keeping grifter con artists out of the country.
Good, we don’t want her or that type of bile spewing rhetoric and politics in our country.
From the court’s judgment:
>37. The implied freedom is not a „personal right“, is not unlimited and is not absolute. It is a limit on legislative and executive power that invalidates a law that so burdens freedom of communication on governmental or political matters that the impugned law may be taken to affect the system of government for which the *Constitution* provides, a system which depends for its existence upon that freedom.
>38. To that end, the implied freedom invalidates a law that impairs or tends to impair the constitutionally prescribed system of representative and responsible government by burdening freedom to communicate on governmental or political matters unless the law has a purpose compatible with that system and is reasonably appropriate and adapted to advancing that purpose in a manner that is consistent with that system.
>39. Where a law is alleged to infringe the implied freedom of political communication, the first question is: does the impugned law effectively burden freedom of communication about governmental or political matters in its terms, operation or effect? Next, is the purpose of the law legitimate, in the sense that it is compatible with the maintenance of the constitutionally prescribed system of representative and responsible government? And third, is the impugned law reasonably appropriate and adapted to advance that purpose in a manner that is compatible with the maintenance of that constitutionally prescribed system of government? If the first question is answered „yes“, and if either of the second or third questions is answered „no“, the law is invalid.
The court found that the Migration Act burdened freedom of communication about governmental or political matters, but that it did so for a legitimate (preventing outsiders from entering the country and fomenting discord) and did so in a reasonable manner.
Why is she trying to flee the country she helped create?
Australia has it’s own arrogant narcissists and don’t need more
The full judgment is here:
https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2025/38.html
Why fly to Australia when she can fly from her left eye to her right eye? Fuck Candace.
She’s an idiot.
Okay but the deal was you had to take all the Murdoch scum back.
Well shit. Now how do we get rid of her? Andorra? You up, fam?
👏🏽👏🏽
God I love Australia
Yet another reason why Australia is awesome.
Well, It’s their country. Control over who enters is their decision.
I want everyone to put this story in their memory bank so when Trump bans someone from the US for wrong think, you can’t complain.