>Parents have been banned from attending their children’s sporting events in a London borough after incidents of bad behaviour from watching adults.
>The Merton School Sport Partnership runs sporting and physical education events across more than 40 primary schools in the southwest London borough, which takes in areas including Wimbledon and Morden.
>Last week the partnership wrote to parents to say that they would no longer be welcome at “the sports events we deliver to our affiliated schools during the school day”.
>Such events include football and hockey tournaments and gymnastics championships. While parents had not been invited into schools, they had previously been allowed to attend those events held in public spaces such as parks or sporting venues.
>Nicola Ryan, the partnership’s director, cited “too many concerning behaviours to be able to continue to accommodate spectators”. Examples of such behaviour included “cutting across finish lines (physically impeding runners)” and “abuse towards officials and other children”. Many of those officials, the letter states, are themselves only secondary school pupils.
>Ryan also cited the creation of a “stressful environment for the participants, with too much pressure around performance and winning at all costs”. Some parents had been coaching children despite not being the coach, “challenging organisers and officials around rules and decisions”, as well as posting photos online without parental consent.
>The decision “has not been made lightly”, the partnership’s letter states. “We hope you will appreciate that our decision is in the best interest and for the safety and welfare of all the children taking part,” it adds.
>School sport partnerships (SSPs) are a Blair-era innovation in which sporting activities are delivered across multiple schools — in theory to increase the quantity of physical education across all schools. Central government funding was pulled in 2011 but some partnerships have survived, including the one in Merton, with funding from the schools themselves.
>Paul Kohler, the MP for Wimbledon, said it was “deeply disappointing [that] the behaviour of a minority of parents has led to this outcome, which penalises the vast majority who have always behaved responsively and supportively.
>“Whilst I understand how disappointed those parents will be, I know they, like me, would not want any child, teacher, or volunteer to ever feel unsafe or threatened at what should be an enjoyable family-friendly event. The focus must always be on creating a positive environment for young people to enjoy sport and develop teamwork and confidence,” he added.
>“I hope this is a temporary measure to provide the space needed to reset expectations around respect and sportsmanship. With co-operation between the Merton School Sport Partnership, schools and parents, I am confident we can find a solution that addresses unacceptable conduct while allowing families to share in their children’s sporting achievements.”
>The Merton partnership did not respond to requests for comment.
High-Tom-Titty on
Parents can get a little carried away with plans for their children. I know some who purposely had theirs in autumn, meaning they would be more developed than kids in their year born in other months.
Alarmed_Inflation196 on
My friends run some kids football in London and it is absolutely disgusting what they have to deal with. 90% of parents seem to be adult children.
Again, another example of a parenting crisis in this country.
ODFoxtrotOscar on
Unfortunately I’m not remotely surprised by the situation the article describes
And I’m glad that the company is putting the children first in removing the behaviour from their events
But it’s shit on the ordinary parents. The proportion who are behaving badly – whether it’s this example or the many other little examples we see of excessive selfishness and antisocial conduct are chipping away at so much.
It’s like 5 points has been wiped of the national IQ and everyone is that bit more stupid and less aware of their impact on others
Mccobsta on
>Nicola Ryan, the partnership’s director, cited “too many concerning behaviours to be able to continue to accommodate spectators”. Examples of such behaviour included “cutting across finish lines (physically impeding runners)” and “abuse towards officials and other children”. Many of those officials, the letter states, are themselves only secondary school pupils.
Yeah that’s completely reasonable for them being banned
And it’s depressing that parents don’t know how to act
tracklesswastes on
Honestly, I’m beginning to believe a return to Victorian parenting might be a change for the better
OldDirtyBusstop on
I’ve seen some pretty appalling behaviour from parents at my kids football training and matches.
At the current one the parents aren’t too bad, but it annoys me when you get them shouting constant instructions to their kids which is the complete opposite of what the coaches are trying to get them to do. Just cheer your kids on, that’s all you need to do.
It’s also sad when the parents get angry with the effort / how well the kid is doing and start shouting at the kid and making them feel bad.
FlockBoySlim on
Sadly doesn’t surprise me. Cunts have kids too. Good on them for taking a stand on the matter and not bowing down to the whims of the parents and their shitty attitude.
Jurassic_Bun on
I got banned from sports day as a child because I kept cheating and had a mother that encouraged it. Same mother that shouted “that’s my boy” when I got thrown out of my leavers party for being drunk. Embarrassing looking back.
IncorrectAddress on
I guess it’s just me that finds this hilarious, next up, „why you should home school away from the crazies that will damage your children while teachers twiddle their thumbs and ignore the issues of their low paid jobs“
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
10 Kommentare
Non paywall link: https://archive.ph/KjoVH
>Parents have been banned from attending their children’s sporting events in a London borough after incidents of bad behaviour from watching adults.
>The Merton School Sport Partnership runs sporting and physical education events across more than 40 primary schools in the southwest London borough, which takes in areas including Wimbledon and Morden.
>Last week the partnership wrote to parents to say that they would no longer be welcome at “the sports events we deliver to our affiliated schools during the school day”.
>Such events include football and hockey tournaments and gymnastics championships. While parents had not been invited into schools, they had previously been allowed to attend those events held in public spaces such as parks or sporting venues.
>Nicola Ryan, the partnership’s director, cited “too many concerning behaviours to be able to continue to accommodate spectators”. Examples of such behaviour included “cutting across finish lines (physically impeding runners)” and “abuse towards officials and other children”. Many of those officials, the letter states, are themselves only secondary school pupils.
>Ryan also cited the creation of a “stressful environment for the participants, with too much pressure around performance and winning at all costs”. Some parents had been coaching children despite not being the coach, “challenging organisers and officials around rules and decisions”, as well as posting photos online without parental consent.
>The decision “has not been made lightly”, the partnership’s letter states. “We hope you will appreciate that our decision is in the best interest and for the safety and welfare of all the children taking part,” it adds.
>School sport partnerships (SSPs) are a Blair-era innovation in which sporting activities are delivered across multiple schools — in theory to increase the quantity of physical education across all schools. Central government funding was pulled in 2011 but some partnerships have survived, including the one in Merton, with funding from the schools themselves.
>Paul Kohler, the MP for Wimbledon, said it was “deeply disappointing [that] the behaviour of a minority of parents has led to this outcome, which penalises the vast majority who have always behaved responsively and supportively.
>“Whilst I understand how disappointed those parents will be, I know they, like me, would not want any child, teacher, or volunteer to ever feel unsafe or threatened at what should be an enjoyable family-friendly event. The focus must always be on creating a positive environment for young people to enjoy sport and develop teamwork and confidence,” he added.
>“I hope this is a temporary measure to provide the space needed to reset expectations around respect and sportsmanship. With co-operation between the Merton School Sport Partnership, schools and parents, I am confident we can find a solution that addresses unacceptable conduct while allowing families to share in their children’s sporting achievements.”
>The Merton partnership did not respond to requests for comment.
Parents can get a little carried away with plans for their children. I know some who purposely had theirs in autumn, meaning they would be more developed than kids in their year born in other months.
My friends run some kids football in London and it is absolutely disgusting what they have to deal with. 90% of parents seem to be adult children.
Again, another example of a parenting crisis in this country.
Unfortunately I’m not remotely surprised by the situation the article describes
And I’m glad that the company is putting the children first in removing the behaviour from their events
But it’s shit on the ordinary parents. The proportion who are behaving badly – whether it’s this example or the many other little examples we see of excessive selfishness and antisocial conduct are chipping away at so much.
It’s like 5 points has been wiped of the national IQ and everyone is that bit more stupid and less aware of their impact on others
>Nicola Ryan, the partnership’s director, cited “too many concerning behaviours to be able to continue to accommodate spectators”. Examples of such behaviour included “cutting across finish lines (physically impeding runners)” and “abuse towards officials and other children”. Many of those officials, the letter states, are themselves only secondary school pupils.
Yeah that’s completely reasonable for them being banned
And it’s depressing that parents don’t know how to act
Honestly, I’m beginning to believe a return to Victorian parenting might be a change for the better
I’ve seen some pretty appalling behaviour from parents at my kids football training and matches.
At the current one the parents aren’t too bad, but it annoys me when you get them shouting constant instructions to their kids which is the complete opposite of what the coaches are trying to get them to do. Just cheer your kids on, that’s all you need to do.
It’s also sad when the parents get angry with the effort / how well the kid is doing and start shouting at the kid and making them feel bad.
Sadly doesn’t surprise me. Cunts have kids too. Good on them for taking a stand on the matter and not bowing down to the whims of the parents and their shitty attitude.
I got banned from sports day as a child because I kept cheating and had a mother that encouraged it. Same mother that shouted “that’s my boy” when I got thrown out of my leavers party for being drunk. Embarrassing looking back.
I guess it’s just me that finds this hilarious, next up, „why you should home school away from the crazies that will damage your children while teachers twiddle their thumbs and ignore the issues of their low paid jobs“