Der erste Bundesstaat Kaliforniens, der behauptet, KI zum Ersetzen eines Schauspielers einzusetzen, verstößt nun gegen das Gesetz
https://www.indy100.com/news/california-ai-laws-actors-gavin-newsom
Der erste Bundesstaat Kaliforniens, der behauptet, KI zum Ersetzen eines Schauspielers einzusetzen, verstößt nun gegen das Gesetz
https://www.indy100.com/news/california-ai-laws-actors-gavin-newsom
28 Kommentare
That’s great! I hope they expand this to other fields to protect workers and written content.
I hope that this becomes bigger and more all around encompassing. I dont want to watch or hear AI. Its good enough to help me write case notes at work and understand information easier.
I don’t think it’s something that needs to be made into law but I guess. Also, I haven’t fully read into it but what’s the difference between a CGI character or using the likeness of someone that’s dead? These are type of things happening on a regular basis in movies.
Does that mean seeing a young Carrie Fisher would now be illegal?
Gosh, those people who pretend to be other people, as a job, sure do take themselves seriously, huh? What about jobs where someone is doing something actually, you know, important? Is it illegal for AI to pretend to be them, too?
Studios are already pulling out of California, but congrats on the law, I guess
I feel like this virtual horse is already out of the virtual barn.
This is literally the only way we are going to be able to protect the role of human actors.
Sadly much the same will have to happen in my other industries like art and music.
The problem is when AI becomes indistinguishable.
Excellent. We need more laws like this restricting AI in other venues as well. It’s getting out of control.
make human actors great again
Fuck AI aint nobody watched the Matrix even bro? 🤣
What about everyone else behind the camera?!
That just means new movies are gonna be made elsewhere.
Thats weird working. What if the rolw is written FOR an AI. What if its a fully AI movie. Is that „replacing“ someone?
What about AI not replacing any human. They aren’t worried about lack of original content. They are worried about loss of revenue.
YouTube is still monetizing anyone who use AI thumbnails, pictures, and videos. Youtube is now FraudTube/IdentityTheftTube/AITube.
so what about movies where it’s a prequel or sequel and the original actor is dead? where is the „line“ of ai defined? what about those actors who’ve consented to the use of their voices and have recorded the the different sounds to be recombined later?
I get where they are coming from but truly just another reason to film in Georgia.
Can’t stand the AI videos that keep coming at me. What’s the point?
„the state is so against making movies.. see all the regulations they have!“
AI should never replace a single worker.
Unfortunately they don’t make movies in California anymore so it doesn’t protect anyone … well, maybe porn actors.
So Hollywood will leave Cali
Of all the truly scary uses for AI this is the one that seems to get the most attention. Sorry, but I’m not losing sleep over these Hollywood dynasties losing roles to AI.
Soooooo… now ALL movies will leave LA, not just most of them?
I know Reddit has always been a tech bro paradise but it’s gross how many people just write off any attempt at protecting jobs
Real question though.
Once AI becomes indistinguishable then why would people pay money for one when the other is free or at least cheaper?
Is it a coincidence this is making headlines at the same time Hollywood just unveiled a legit AI actress they intend to use in movies?