Share.

    43 Kommentare

    1. So we’re back to empty nuclear threats? Actually a good sign that they are getting weaker and weaker…

    2. New nuclear weapons? Why, something wrong with the old ones? Someone replaced the plutonium with bricks and the guidance system with sand?

    3. SCARfaceRUSH on

      > Ukraine is about to receive M777 howitzers

      Russia: NUKES!!!

      > Ukraine is about to receive HIMARS

      Russia: NUKESSS!!!

      > Ukraine is about to receive Bradleys

      Russia: NUKE OCLOCK!!

      > Ukraine is about to receive ATACMS

      Russia: NUKES EVERYWHERE!!!

      > Ukraine is about to receive Patriots

      Russia: WWIII, NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST!

      ————————– You’re Here ———————————-

      If it’s the „nuclear“ o’clock all over again, then maybe Ukraine will receive SOMETHING!?!?! Maybe not Tomahawks. I’m hoping for at least JASSMs, though.

      P.S. Anyone believing this nuclear blackmail is uninformed, to say the least. They keep doing it because it keeps working.

      As a reminder, ATACMs were delayed precisely because there were „fears of escalation“ and Russia’s nuclear rhetoric was high. It resulted in Ukraine’s failed offensive in 2023 because it was prepared and executed with the shipments in mind (including ATACMs). This allowed Russia to use its helicopters as quick reaction forces and plug the gaps wherever Ukraine successfully formed local breakthroughs. AS SOON AS ATACMS arrived, Russian forward-positioned heliports were wrecked. But it was a few months late, in late August 2023. This is just one example.

      Why wouldn’t Russia keep up the rattling?! It’s working.

    4. Says the same country thats just cancelled most of its aviation and navy spending because they are sliding into a financial meltdown

    5. Given the US and UK and France are also all doing that, doesn’t seem surprising. Ultimately most of the designs in service are 50 years old these days.

    6. The country using donkeys for logistics threatens nukes. Just fuck off already!

    7. Because the old ones got cannibalized for parts or neglected so badly they cannot be used. Got it! Russia sure is scary like bunny slippers.

    8. Emotional_Pattern185 on

      Nothing is as it seems in Russia, so take this with a pinch of salt!

    9. What I understand from his statement is that the ones they have are crap or no longer work.

    10. RottenPingu1 on

      Did he say this yesterday? Wouldn’t be right to miss „Nuclear Threat Thursday“.

    11. NotoriousBedorveke on

      Yet they cannot perperly even launch their ballistic rocket Satan, with which they threaten to strike Washington. The last time they tried to test it, it exploded in the shaft 🤭

    12. dr_tardyhands on

      If they are having a hard time maintaining planes, trains and automobiles I have a hard time believing that they’re in a condition to develop novel nuclear weapons.

    13. The ones they have in storage probably don’t work and are expired from failing to refuel the tritium and maintaining the damn things.

      They’ve failed to run any real nuclear tests to demonstrate their working arsenal in a long time. 

    Leave A Reply