‚The Canadian Cancer Society says drinking about three drinks a day could double the risk of developing cancer of the mouth, pharynx, larynx and esophagus, and increase the risk of colorectal and breast cancer by one-and-a-half times.‘
A warning seems like the least we could do. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, eh?
DeathCabForYeezus on
I came into this thinking it was dumb, but overall I think I would actually appreciate it.
> The proposed bill also would require clear labels stating what constitutes a standard drink, the number of drinks per container and the number of drinks that Health Canada considers a health risk
It’s effectively an alcohol nutrition label and shockingly reasonable.
I guess to me it’s a bit of a parallel to putting calories on the menu like they did in Ontario. If I’m ordering a carrot cake muffin at a cafe I know it isn’t good for me, but when you see the little bastard is actually 1100 calories you may think twice, or maybe you say I don’t give a shit, I want the muffin.
Same thing here. If the tallboy of Fat Tug says it’s 2 standard drinks, maybe instead of 2 tallboys of Fat Tug I’ll get 2 tallboys of something else and consume 2-3 standard drinks instead.
Or maybe I want a pair of Fat Tugs and I don’t give a shit.
Adding a purely factual label that does effectively the ABV x volume doesn’t make a difference.
throwitawaytothesea on
I think that this would have the effect of dulling people to cancer warnings. Nobody drinks for health benefits and we already spend millions convincing people to drink responsibly. Should deli meats and potato chip bags be next? Are we going to become like California where even [Disneyland](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Disneyland_Prop_65_Warning_crop.jpg) is forced to display a generic cancer warning to visitors?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
3 Kommentare
‚The Canadian Cancer Society says drinking about three drinks a day could double the risk of developing cancer of the mouth, pharynx, larynx and esophagus, and increase the risk of colorectal and breast cancer by one-and-a-half times.‘
A warning seems like the least we could do. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, eh?
I came into this thinking it was dumb, but overall I think I would actually appreciate it.
> The proposed bill also would require clear labels stating what constitutes a standard drink, the number of drinks per container and the number of drinks that Health Canada considers a health risk
It’s effectively an alcohol nutrition label and shockingly reasonable.
I guess to me it’s a bit of a parallel to putting calories on the menu like they did in Ontario. If I’m ordering a carrot cake muffin at a cafe I know it isn’t good for me, but when you see the little bastard is actually 1100 calories you may think twice, or maybe you say I don’t give a shit, I want the muffin.
Same thing here. If the tallboy of Fat Tug says it’s 2 standard drinks, maybe instead of 2 tallboys of Fat Tug I’ll get 2 tallboys of something else and consume 2-3 standard drinks instead.
Or maybe I want a pair of Fat Tugs and I don’t give a shit.
Adding a purely factual label that does effectively the ABV x volume doesn’t make a difference.
I think that this would have the effect of dulling people to cancer warnings. Nobody drinks for health benefits and we already spend millions convincing people to drink responsibly. Should deli meats and potato chip bags be next? Are we going to become like California where even [Disneyland](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Disneyland_Prop_65_Warning_crop.jpg) is forced to display a generic cancer warning to visitors?