
Ich habe eine interaktive Karte erstellt, die sich visualisiert Wie weit geht Ihr Gehalt wirklich in US -Städten.
Es verwendet Lebenshaltungs- und Wohnungskostendaten von der Bea, HUD und BLSund schätzt, was Sie an anderer Stelle verdienen müssen, um den gleichen Lebensstil aufrechtzuerhalten.
Beispiel: Verdienst $ 100k in Detroit fühlt sich ungefähr ungefähr an:
- $ 115.000 in Chicago
- 189.000 USD in New York
- 201.000 US -Dollar in San Francisco
Ich habe das zum Spaß und Forschung gemacht (und um einige Debatten mit meinen Freunden zu gewinnen). Es hat absolut keine Anzeigen, keine bezahlten Funktionen und keine Datenerfassung. Es wurde aus Neugier darüber hergestellt, wie sich die regionalen Preise auf die Ausgabeleistung auswirken.
Erkunden Sie die Karte hier: Howmuchamiworth.com
(Bild zeigt einen Beispielvergleich.)
Von BusinessPilot4614
![[OC] Visualisieren, wie weit Ihr Geld in den US [OC] Visualisieren, wie weit Ihr Geld in den US](https://www.bytesde.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/jzvp169thptf1-1024x683.png)
17 Kommentare
**Source**:
– U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) — Regional Price Parities (RPP)
– U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) — Fair Market Rent (FMR) Data
– U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) — Regional CPI and Cost Index Data
**Tool**:
– Custom interactive map built with React, Vercel, and Leaflet.js
– Data processing and normalization done in Python (pandas)
**Methods**:
I combined three federal datasets to create a composite **cost-of-living index** for each U.S. metro area:
* **BEA – Regional Price Parities (RPP):** Used the *“All Items”* RPP index to represent the overall price level for goods and services (base = 100, U.S. average).
* **HUD – Fair Market Rents (FMR):** Used the 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent to calculate a *housing factor* by dividing each metro’s rent by the national median rent.
* **BLS – Consumer Price Index (CPI):** Applied metro- or region-specific CPI data to adjust all price indices to current-year dollars (base year = 2020).
These three metrics are combined into a **composite index** using the weighted formula:
>
Housing accounts for 33% of the total weight, while other goods and services make up the remaining 67%.
To estimate relative purchasing power between cities:
>
This returns the income required in the target city to maintain the same purchasing power as the origin city.
For example, a $100K salary in Lansing, MI (index = 0.95) is roughly equivalent to $187K in New York City (index = 1.78).
All calculations use publicly available government data; individual results will vary by personal spending habits and neighborhood-level differences.
I combined regional price parity, housing, and cost-of-living data to calculate how much income would be needed to maintain the same purchasing power between metro areas. The visualization displays relative salary equivalence and percentage cost difference between origin and destination cities.
**Project**:
You can explore the live interactive version here: [HowMuchAmIWorth.com](http://HowMuchAmIWorth.com)
**(No ads, tracking, or data collection, created for fun and research.)**
Clicking around it seems like a lot of cities don’t have HUD data. How is that accounted for in the calculation?
Could have just been one image with cost of living percentages. Adding extra steps to make it „interactive“ is just annoying.
What does it mean when a city is listed as *<city>, US*?
I guess since it is a very big city, Pittsburgh, US is PA. And Greensboro, US is almost certainly NC.
But how about „Albany, US“? There are a bunch and none are particularly big and there are three in the 50-100k population range.
ahh great, everything is more expensive compared to where I live
2BR in NYC for $2850? Uhhh
i put in durham, NC near where i live and it seems almost every city is more expensive, which shouldn’t be the case? even fayeteville NC is more expensive. as is winston salem, NC. Also memphis, tulsa, lexington, dayton. something is wrong?
Anchorage NY should be Anchorage AK.
Nice tool, would be great to plug in Int’l cities.
A map highlighting were people want to live, and Alaska.
Something ain’t right about this calculator. Must VASTLY underestimate housing costs.
No way is Tucson AZ 0.4% cheaper than Denver, CO. Comparable homes (if you ignore the crime and oppressive heat of Tucson) houses are $300,000 versus $650,000 in Denver.
This is kind of great as it is making my consideration to move to CO from where I currently live easier to convences my wife as it is cheaper over all right now in Denver than Austin.
Heads up, Bakersfield, CA is pulling data for Augusta, GA
📣📣Greenville, SC mentioned ‼️
These kinds of cost comparisons are VERY misleading. Here’s an example –
Detroit’s core rent is cheap. But there are a lot of areas that are cheap af and not great to live in. For example, downtown Detroit, a nice 2br apartment is like 2100-3000/mo. To live in a north suburb (which is like majority of the ‚Detroit‘ population) is like $1600-2000/mo.
Similarly, I don’t think NYC is anywhere close to that cheap.
You have some errors right off the bat: Washington does not have an income tax, and the average rent for a 2 bedroom apartment is like $2800.
Portland, ME is incorrectly coded as being Portland, PA. Seems like an isolated incident but I didn’t check everywhere.
You should factor in the difference in salaries, otherwise people are gonna make some pretty bad decisions based on this.
Plus, most COL calculations are really really bad. They don’t factor in lifestyle changes or social safety nets. For example, living in a city without a car usually means higher salaries and saving huge amounts on automobile costs, living somewhere with limited food access and no parks usually means an increased reliance on healthcare throughout life. Also, places like Washington give guaranteed parental leave, and have minimal wage without tip déductions and require minimum wage for gig workers.
Generally, disposable income measurements are better, but the best way to really calculate wealth differences is to just look at the median wealth and correct for age.