Deloitte, die australische Regierung zurückerstattet, nachdem er Bericht erbracht hatte, in dem KI verwendet und nicht existierende Quellen zitiert wurde

    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/06/deloitte-to-pay-money-back-to-albanese-government-after-using-ai-in-440000-report

    Share.

    17 Kommentare

    1. what in the world. you can use AI for research but why do you directly put it in the final report?

    2. PaganQueenNaturally on

      Why on earth would you use AI and not freaking verify the results? My gosh adults seem to be more childlike than actual children.

    3. Bored_guy_in_dc on

      Too many CEOs are pushing AI just because they want to say their company is using it. I have no doubt in my mind that this was the result of some bigwig idiot saying „We have to start using AI now, or we will fall behind!“ Bullshit.

    4. “Deloitte has a human intelligence problem. This would be laughable if it wasn’t so lamentable. A partial refund looks like a partial apology for substandard work,” she said.

      “Anyone looking to contract these firms should be asking exactly who is doing the work they are paying for, and having that expertise and no AI use verified.

      “Perhaps instead of a big consulting firm, procurers would be better off signing up for a ChatGPT subscription.”

      Yikes, Deloitte. Not a good look.

    5. ExactTemperature2468 on

      Looks like we’re stuck in the timeline that has Down syndrome.

      Companies opting in for idiots using AI.
      Governments are stupid enough to trust it.

      It’s like watching dumb and dumber without the jokes.

    6. Honestly that is a big advantage being a private company, there’s no stock tumble to show that the public all agrees the private company is untrustworthy and will inevitably be unprofitable.

    7. They probably used their own AI wrapper which I have heard from my friends at Deloitte is – ‚utter shit‘

    8. GuaranteedCougher on

      It’s insane how high the hallucination rates on most AI models are. I can’t believe companies are willing to risk an LLM telling legally actionable lies to their customers just to save a little money

    9. This is why I don’t allow my team to use AI. Even searching through our own internal docs, we’ve found it just makes shit up. AI searching through financial rules and regulations is laughable.

    10. grathontolarsdatarod on

      Ahhhhhh. How much did they charge?

      And what agenda were they supporting for the government?

      That report should be „posted for the class to see“. Its actually a serious issue.

    11. They should be put on a government ban list. Their job is to know this is unacceptable.

      Even chat says:

      The repercussions for Deloitte should be substantial and systemic, not just symbolic. This case isn’t a simple mistake — it’s about a major firm delivering flawed, AI-generated content in a high-stakes public policy report, without proper disclosure or validation.

    Leave A Reply