Close Menu
    Veränderungen in der Late -Night -TV -Bewertungen über 15 Jahre
    Daten

    Veränderungen in der Late -Night -TV -Bewertungen über 15 Jahre

    Share.
    View 23 Comments

    23 Kommentare

    6. mrkitzero on

      The only reason for linear tv is for sports. The format is dead and streaming/YouTube is slowly suffocating it.

    7. Impressive-Tip-1689 on

      Could someone explain what „Nielsen Live+7 Rating Track“ includes for the people living outside the US? And how is the general trend in linear broadcasting? How are online views on YouTube taken in account?

    8. aspiring_bureaucrat on

      Even amid recent controversies I haven’t watched

      Kimmel’s monologue may have been „important“ but I assumed it was not magically going to become funny

    9. roundelay11 on

      Late Night tv shows are mainly for boomer retirees with insomnia who can’t let go of cable. Which, I guess that’s a valid demographic, but the problem with that demographic is they tend to *die*.

    11. SharpHawkeye on

      “Last year’s jokes about Mitch McConnell aren’t going to be binge-watched in Thailand,” the analyst notes. “You make it, you air it, and it’s done. That’s a very expensive way to run a TV show in the current climate.”

      It would seem to me the solution is to reformat the shows into more of a “Hot Ones” or a “Charlie Rose” style interview format and lose the monologue, house band, and audience.

    12. buddy843 on

      This is proof data snippets don’t tell the full story.

      To be accurate we would need to see how it does compared to the network each is on. Each of these shows could be a leader for the network yet we only see the decline in network tv.

      We would also need consumer viewers ship over this time frame. What if people are just watching less TV?

      It would also be useful to see people not on Network TV in the same sector. Are they going up or down?

      Basically you can’t take one datapoint on a graph and only display it. Then claim correlation is causation.

    14. strangerzero on

      I don’t find any of the current crop of late night hosts very entertaining or funny.

    15. fn0000rd on

      If i want a celebrity interview I’ll listen to Smartless or Good Hang or even watch Hot Ones.

      I do love a good monologue, but I generally listen to them on YouTube while i’m in the shower.

      11:30PM is pretty much when I try and fail to talk myself into stopping playing <insert current videogame here> to go to bed.

    17. jaypizzl on

      I’ve watched thousands of episodes of tv in the last ten years, including hundreds of the Late Show, and zero percent was live. The only thing I’ve watched love has been sports. I don’t think that’s particularly uncommon.

    18. foboz123 on

      I mean, there used to be these programs called „variety shows“ way, way back in the day. Viewership tastes changed, ad revenue fell, and they don’t exist any more. Late night talk is going the same way.

    19. Bennnnetttt on

      Late Night officially died when Conan went off the air. Since then it has just been Ad Talk Shows. They have always had ads and been great for advertising, but they were variety shows with some ads. Now they are ads with some entertainment.

    20. dsp_guy on

      I don’t see ratings being down as a problem caused by Fallon or Kimmel or Colbert. Ratings are down because less people spend time watching TV, or don’t like talk shows or don’t want to stay up to 1230 on a weekday.

      One could argue the ratings drop would be faster without the hosts and writers we have today. But it is just delaying the inevitable.

    21. full-grown-baby on

      Conan and Colbert are the only hosts to show real interest in interviews. Fallon and Kimmel do it for money and change their views every other week to whatever will get clicks

    23. urbanek2525 on

      I think that the key, here, is the lack of re-run value. They desperately need to re-format the show so it can be binge-able. People just aren’t into live TV as much as they were. Here’s what I’d do.

      Openning monologue needs to be shorter and less important. Too much time is spent here. We don’t need a re-hash of current events anymore. We’re bombarded with them. Political jojes get old and unwelcome in minutes. That was all Colbert had. It was his entire schtick and look how that’s pkaying out now.

      Instead, the openning monologue should focus on that night’s guests. Make funny, supportive humor about them and their projects. You can also make fun of commercial products because this captures a slice of time.

      The value is in the guest interviews and the musical guests. These are things that are time independent. Focus on these. These capture a slice of time in a world that changes too fast.

      Instead of packaging episodes by date, package them by guest. Make it it so you can watch all of Hale Berry’s appearances in order. People would watch that on streaming platforns.

    Leave A Reply