Die NATO warnte Moskau vor der Bereitschaft, Flugzeuge abzuschießen. Europäische Diplomaten erklärten russische MIG-31-Flüge über Estland inakzeptabel

    https://sfg.media/en/a/nato-warned-moscow-shoot-down-aircraft/

    Von sergeyfomkin

    Share.

    12 Kommentare

    1. AmethystOrator on

      How would russia respond to NATO aircraft violating russian airspace?

    2. readilyunavailable on

      Good? If you are regularly violating other nations air space, despite all the warnings, then you’re basically, as we wsay, pulling the devils tail.

    3. Lower_Box_6169 on

      Posturing by both sides because some sort of ceasefire deal is close? Or a blatant escalation?

    4. _hhhnnnggg_ on

      Can we just practice missile shooting? We have free target practices from our best friend, Ivan.

    5. NATO vs Russia

      Active personnel ~ 3.3 million (or more NATO) vs~ 1.1 million active duty

      Reserve personnel ~ 3.1 million (NATO) vs ~ 1.5 million reserves

      Tanks ~ 12,500 (NATO) vs ~ 6,400 (Russia)

      Armored fighting vehicles (AFVs) ~ 88,300 vs ~ 14,800

      Total aircraft ~ 21,100 vs ~ 4,700

      Navy / naval vessels ~ 2,400+ ships of various types (NATO) vs ~ 650+ ships (Russia)

      Nuclear warheads (approx) ~ 5,559 (U.S., UK, France share) vs ~ 5,580 Russia

      What are they thinking? Russia is fucked. We should dismantle whole country as it was always proboems with it in history, thats good time to end it.

    6. Still running MiG-31s? Man i remember it being playable in the game Air Combat for the Ps1. It was old then already.

    7. SteakHausMann on

      The already violated Latvian and US airspace again, NATO behaved as always 

    8. Shoot them down then do what Russia would do and say we didn’t, perhaps it just crashed, then demand for impossible standards of evidence.

    Leave A Reply