Ich habe diese gerade auf Twitter gepostet, dachte ich?

Handler?

My question is, what was the mechanism and purpose of institutions and large corporations actively participating in the alienation of the majority by foisting radical leftism upon the masses?

Was that just a deliberate subversion tactic orchestrated by right wing power players embedded in these positions of power?

That pic is funny. Yeah, I didn’t agree with him either but was kinda mad about his death. I feel bad for his wife, but there is something weird with the way she speaks, like a bad actress. I was getting Kimberly guilfoyle vibes from her speech the other day. Maybe that’s just how people talk now, idk. I don’t have any thoughts on parents other than rich connected people have rich connected children, you know.

Great clues!

Weird if you look up the structure of the free masons he would be 12⁰

Also didn’t Trump or someone call charlie a m“aster builder“?

„In Freemasonry, a „master builder“ is a symbolic role, not a rank, representing a Master Mason who guides and men-
tors others in building their
moral character and contributing to the fraternity’s goals.“

Somebody’s waking up.

There has been red flags all over the place. How is it a grieving widow of young children decides to give a filmed speech just days after the death not to mention the cringy video by his casket.

This whole thing feels way off.

Plus there is so much noise going on all around this from scrutinizing the death scene to questioning the motives and character of the assassin.

It’s just one big manufactured soap opera with King orange doing his part.

As far as I am concerned we are in the end times because this world has radically changed since 2017.

I think the show is wrapping up and a big reset is coming.

More information you can find just by googling:

Charlie Kirk was also a member of the [Council for National Policy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_for_National_Policy) (leaked in 2020).

[Paul Weyrich](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Weyrich) co-founded the **Heritage Foundation** in 1973 and the **Council for National Policy** in 1981. (He also co-founded the Moral Majority)

In **July 2001**, (just before 9/11) he helped write „The Integration of Theory and Practice“, a long-term plan which called for the use of **deception, misinformation, and divisiveness** to allow conservative evangelical Christian Republicans to gain and keep control of seats of power in the government of the United States.

>Our strategy will be to bleed this corrupt culture dry. We will pick off the most intelligent and creative individuals in our society, the individuals who help give credibility to the current regime. Our movement will be entirely destructive, and entirely constructive. **We will not try to reform the existing institutions. We only intend to weaken them, and eventually destroy them…**. We will maintain a constant barrage of criticism against the Left. We will attack the very legitimacy of the Left…. We will use guerrilla tactics to undermine the legitimacy of the dominant regime

>We will take advantage of every available opportunity to spread the idea that there is something fundamentally wrong with the existing state of affairs. … contribute to a vague sense of uneasiness and dissatisfaction with existing society. … **We need to break down before we can build up. We must first clear away the flotsam of a decayed culture.**

>There will be three main stages in the unfolding of this movement. The first stage will be devoted to the development of a **highly motivated elite** able to coordinate future activities. The second stage will be devoted to the development of institutions designed to make an impact on the wider elite and a relatively small minority of the masses. The third stage will involve changing the overall character of American popular culture…

Weyrich saw the Christian Right’s vision of traditional values as the legitimate and moral side. The other side, cast as the camp of secular liberalism, he saw as immoral and illegitimate. While Weyrich saw these opponents as in rough alignment with the two main political parties, his aim was never merely about electing Republicans. He was about forging a revolutionary Christian nationalist movement to undermine the legitimacy of what he saw as a liberal, secular democratic order.

In 2020, Trump attended a meeting and gave a speech at the Council for National Policy. Note that on 9/11, Trump’s building became the tallest in New York, a fact he happily bragged about on the day of the attacks. It also conveniently allowed for the **Patriot Act**, which began weakening our rights.

Trump’s entire administration consists of Council for National Policy and Heritage Foundation members, yet he claimed to know nothing about Project 2025.

[This video from 20 years ago](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgQoOCdV6aU) talks about the Council for National Policy and its plan to destroy our democracy to replace it with a [theonomy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theonomy).

I didn’t even know about CK’s family’s connection to Trump but that just makes it even more suspicious.

I Usually don’t agree with much on here but my ears are up on this one

Shit is whacked when you realize US defense companies have divisions committed to Israel’s defense.

i mean, those things are all true. there’s a lot linking erika kirk to alleged trafficking as well. kirk’s relationship with don jr seems to be forgotten about or maybe purposefully avoided… he was a lot closer than it’s been made out to be

Hhhhhmmmm I thought something was off.

This post is a reminder that very often the people who rise to prominence on social media don’t really do so in an organic way. Did Charlie Kirk work hard with TPUSA? Of course he did, but it’s not as if he’d be out on the street if he failed.

As soon as I learned of his murder, I immediately started to think that this will further divide the nation. I read many, many rallying for stricter gun laws or regulation of guns which isn’t absurd. However, since he was talking about gang violence & school shooting at the time of his death, the government (I don’t fall into that bipartisan rhetoric of right v. left because they’re wings on the same bird) will use his death to enforce abolishment of guns for personal use making it easier for them to implement martial law, become a totalitarian state, and keep their puppet in office indefinitely. After reading those tweets, I agree that something is off since both of their families, were not only elites, but they were friendly/supported the political leaders of today. I don’t believe in happenstance or coincidence. This was orchestrated, including Kirk’s death, a long time ago.

This is all a little weird. I mean it makes sense that she would marry a man like Charlie. If all of this is true then they were a “perfect” match.
On the other hand who in the hell are these people?!?!?! Can someone really have such a perfect family,perfect children,perfect relationship. Me personally I have a good relationship and good children etc but compared to these people I’m feeling a little insecure about my family. I don’t know what to believe anymore.

It’s all one big club and we ain’t in it.