Hier ist das YouTube-Video und ein Nahaufnahme-Screenshot. Weißes Hemd, schwarze Handschuhe, ein definitives Gewehr, und es könnte die Beleuchtung oder das Fehlen von, aber das scheint eine dunklere Hautpigmentierung zu sein.
Von Rylus1
Hier ist das YouTube-Video und ein Nahaufnahme-Screenshot. Weißes Hemd, schwarze Handschuhe, ein definitives Gewehr, und es könnte die Beleuchtung oder das Fehlen von, aber das scheint eine dunklere Hautpigmentierung zu sein.
Von Rylus1
26 Kommentare
Most plausible explanation I’ve seen.
I’d say we would need to see the FOV from that vantage point. Especially with that tent over top of him. I’m still leaning towards plaid shirt guy with a palm pistol. The 30.06 story is just complete bullshit.
So you’re saying Bush did it?
Odd that you’ve created a screenshot of the bush with a separate photo of a guy with a rifle superimposed over it rather than a screenshot of what the plant actually looks like. Really makes me think you’re honest and not cooking up some bullshit.
Wow… this video is VERY good
Bullet trajectory analyses don’t lie!
GPS coordinates of Bushman location
40°16’38″N 111°42’49″W
Thats the most accurate assessment yet
to clear up everything. I am on my PC, I paused the video at 7:24, I hit the key Print SysRq on my keyboard, I then isolated the screenshot with the windows screenshot tool, I opened the screenshot, zoomed in and took another screenshot to have a much larger image. That is literally all I did.
Meanwhile Tyler Robinson is probably being tortured to extract a confession in exchange for taking the firing squad off the table.
That’s literally the clip art of the sniper he showed as an example in the video, you clearly photoshopped this. What he shows in the video is way blurrier and is not this image you doctored.
After watching that slow mo vid is there anyone that refutes he was 100% shot from back right & the neck is the exit wound? That is a pretty damning video. So most of us were right that this has been bullshit from the start. Question remains, now what are we supposed to do about it?
For anyone who believe this crap, play the video in 0.5x, you’ll clearly see a chain/earpiece swinging upwards instead of what he calls „the exit wound“, there might be a conspiracy but this isn’t it.
It’s his necklace making that image appear on the left that this video is saying is a bullet. There is clear video from the right side of Charlie’s head that shows his necklace just back on impact.
This is a better video about the ballistics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltakvGyzfZs&rco=1
But the OP video does add the potential bush man.
If I had to guess, the round was like a 22arc or something small and fast.
He was under a tent how would this angle even work?
Back and to the left. Back and to the left. Back and to the left.
While our tax dollars are funding their cover up.
[this plant](https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1965977125065728435?t=0sAsY9XBIx9l5PPBVpHhfg&s=19)
can we get an upscaled pic from someone who knows editing? I know the subject is rife with suspicions of AI generated slop (text ‚exchange‘).
Thats not the guy they told us did it 😆😆😆
Is the flash at 25 seconds supposed to be the bullet or could somebody be in that corridor if it’s not the plant?
People weren’t sitting behind Charlie. How does anyone believe this?
If I were trying to cover this up, these absurd theories would be incredibly helpful.
The dude in the youtube video is looking at the wrong tent. If that is a guy behind a bush then he is not at the right angle for his theory on being shot behind the ear to be possible. Charlie was under the white tent.
Isn’t that an earpiece coming off of his right ear?
In the vid, there was an overlaid reference image of a guy with a gun. I assumed that was to illustrate the interpretation of the person by the bush, but you seem to have overlaid it to create this screenshot… Or am I misunderstanding something?