Share.

    5 Kommentare

    1. benstheredonethat on

      Biggest piece of new evidence is no exit wound in the back. Candace wouldn’t lie about what she saw.

      Only leaves two possible explanations in my mind. The bullet either stayed in Charlie. Or the „entry wound“ we saw wasn’t actually from a high caliber rifle but instead it was a low caliber „exit wound“ from a small hand gun.

      There will be a shit show when the feds officialy claim the case is closed, killer caught in 33 hours, IYKYK.

    2. LeftBrainDominant on

      The fact that TPUSA’s unofficial explanation for this was to „turn it in to the feds“ implies that this was an inside job against him. The guy in the shades knew this would happen. You don’t just walk on a crime scene and move things, especially if there was blood all over (which Candace is saying there wasn’t).

    3. PurposeCharacter2891 on

      He wouldn’t have a head if he were shot with a 30:06 from that range. There would be blood, and brain matter all over the inside of that tent. He was not wearing a bulletproof vest, he had something under his shirt that day tho.

    4. Has body armor been ruled out? (Sorry if I missed it). Always looked to me like the shot bounced off his heart and upward into his neck and possibly ended in his skull.

    Leave A Reply