Nicht jeder kanadische Abgeordnete stand, um Charlie Kirk zu ehren – South Surrey MP Ernie Klassen, er und andere Kollegen, die der Geste enthielten. Hier ist der Grund.

    https://thetyee.ca/News/2025/09/18/Not-Every-MP-Rose-Honour-Charlie-Kirk/

    Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. Charlie Kirk is not a Canadian. Why is this even on our radar? Let’s focus our time on Canadian culture and Canadian persons.

    2. Separate_Football914 on

      Our MP didn’t had any reason to stand to someone like Kirk. He isn’t Canadian, worked against Canadian values and was one of the main support of the current predicament that we have thanks to Don Al Trump.

    3. J4ckD4wkins on

      Glad that people who do not support Kirk’s brand of hate and bigotry are also being represented in our parliament.

    4. Equivalent_Age_5599 on

      Just stupid. The point goes far beyond Charlie Kirk, and that’s what people are missing. It’s not even about gun control because he was killed with a rifle (bolt action hunting rifle) readily available in Canada, Australia, England or even Japan that have some of the strictest gun control on earth. So this argument is incredibly relevant in our country, because there is nothing stopping a similar event from occurring here.

      And let’s odd course separate obvious harassment or enticement to violence. That’s not what I mean by a difference of opinions, and there is not a single shred of evidence Charlie was guilty of either of those things. He held opinions I vehemently disagreed with, being a pro choice conservative myself. So let’s forget that as well.

      Let’s forget about Charlie Kirk, his veiws and everything. It’s not important in the context of this argument.

      Do we want to devolve into a society where people get killed for expressing their opinions? Is that what a free society looks like?

      Freedom of speech means you will hear things that you don’t like. Otherwise it’s not freedom, it’s literally tyranny. If you can get murdered for having the wrong opinions, (believe me all of us hold opinions that deviate from the mainstream), then what happened to Charlie presumably could happen to ANY OF US. Is this what people want?

      And even if you believe what Charlie was doing was hate speech; I’ll respectfully disagree; but let’s assume he did. Then it can be handled in a legal manner, not an extra judicial murder method. If you are happy about this, you are a bad person period.

    5. TheFallingStar on

      It is difficult to consider voting for CPC when they love to do stuff like this. Always have affinity towards MAGA.

      She can make the same point in the House without mentioning his name.

    6. Our MPs stood for Charlie Kirk, but not for the schoolchildren shot on the same day, because political violence threatens them personally. This is an expression of self-interest.

    Leave A Reply