Brigitte Macron zwingen, zu beweisen, dass sie eine Frau ist
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/brigitte-macron-transvestigation-candace-owens-natacha-rey-b2828981.html
Von 1-randomonium
Brigitte Macron zwingen, zu beweisen, dass sie eine Frau ist
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/brigitte-macron-transvestigation-candace-owens-natacha-rey-b2828981.html
Von 1-randomonium
21 Kommentare
I feel like burden of proof should be on Owens. She made the claim that Brigitte Macron was a man, so she should be the one who has to prove her claim in the court of law.
Edit: I’m not a lawyer for a reason. The replies are showing me why.
Yeah, it’s absolute madness. But fucking those conspiracy nuts out of their last penny will sure be satisfying.
In all fairness, this specific cradle robber kind of has it coming.
The assertion is ridiculous, but being a pedo is generally a male thing so I can see how people might be confused.
Mdme Macron should not need to provide any proof. First, because then every asshole can deter any discussion by demanding such „proofs“, second because it’s not a problem even if she were born as a man. It’s nobody’s business.
DNA would end this very quickly. Dont need no pics.
We did it gang
Its really weird that Macron feels the needs to stoop to Owens level. Why do you care? No one is forced to prove anything. You can just ignore it. So what if a group of Americans think you married a man? How does that effect France at all? By the way, it was a Frenchmen that convinced her of this in the first place. Why are you not bringing him to court as well?
If you’re going to sue someone for libel you have to prove that what they said was untrue, that they knew it was untrue or knew of good reason to suspect it was untrue and that it caused you harm. Also if you’re a public figure you have to prove that they intended it to cause you harm.
The alternative is that any time someone says something you don’t like you get to sue them and not have to prove anything.
I would rather live in the former world than the latter. The Macrons won’t win this in court. They might get some out-of-court go away money.
Well… the conspiracy theorist in chief (Candace Owens) is going to have to pay them a hefty sum so it’s not about whether or not they’re powerful but rather if or not they should win the Darwin award of economics.
The scary thought is that this can happen at all.
But the scarier thought is that the conspiracist(s) won’t learn a thing coming out of this. It’ll be on to the next one.
I’m more concerned by the fact that she is a pedo
I hope they manage to bankrupt Owen.
Is this just curiosity, or did Owens make money from this case?
Stupidity has become mainstream.
I hope they win Alex Jones (InfoWars) style.
She is a man
Lol people read too much into this, I think they just want to make her accountable and ruin her financially, trust me she will feel it and is not happy about this.
Is Candace Owens even a woman? We really should see the proof.
So she showed her coochie?
I don’t understand all the drama just live stream her showing the world her vangininina.
Presumably they are only doing it do the damages will be paid and profitable. Easy Win i would have though. Candace better have a coinnbag as big as her mouth