Ein Typ brach das angebliche Gewehr, das in der Charlie Kirk verwendet wurde, und versuchte es in einen gigantischen Rucksack zu versetzen. Es passte nicht.
Von SuperStarBoyOne
Ein Typ brach das angebliche Gewehr, das in der Charlie Kirk verwendet wurde, und versuchte es in einen gigantischen Rucksack zu versetzen. Es passte nicht.
Von SuperStarBoyOne
21 Kommentare
?
Obviously. That’s why is breaks down into 3 pieces 👀
So we’re left with him having an accomplice or leaving parts lying around. The government haven’t thought this through
It was never in a backpack. He wrapped it in a towel and hid it in his pant leg. That’s why he was seen walking funny in the video *before* the shooting.
In the video of him on the roof, he throws the gun down to the grass before climbing down. It’s grainy, so hard to see, but if you zoom in you can see him drop it down near the corner.
The gun was never disassembled, just concealed well.
where
is
the
BULLET?
Ya even if it did fit they want us to believe he disassembled it in les than two seconds (video shows him running across roof immediately after the shot) then jumping off the roof THEN RE ASSEMBLING IT only to toss it in the woods lol LOL
Brothers don’t be angry, be good at research and be good at getting things wrong several times in a row without being angry
Could he not have had someone plant the gun ahead of time?
Yeah I thought how the fuck did he climb down with that rifle in the back, it wouldn’t have looked like that, and I assumed he threw it off the roof first
No look, you simply don’t understand – HE HAD A TRANS PARTNER!
Missing bullet? – Trans Partner
Missing rifle on any footage? – Trans Partner
Defying physics? – Trans Partner
Magical pants that can conceal a 4 ft rile? – Trans Partner
Self admission? – Trans Partner
Escape route? – Trans Partner
Listen guys, it’s incredibly simple. He had Trans partner, he did it.
I think you see in the video of him jumping off the roof it’s wrapped in a black towel already . It’s hard to see but I believe it’s there
Thought he shoved the rifle in his pants which is why the video after shows him walking weird down the street
There are 2 different pics floating around of the rifle. The one with the wood stock looks just like a barrel break pellet gun. I wish we knew the height of the shooter. The gun is reported to be over 40 inches. That means avg 6ft guy the stock of the rifle would be sticking out of his pants. Going up the stairs with a rifle in your pants you would look like a pirate with a peg leg one step and swing the other leg up.
If the rifle don’t fit…you must acquit.
The only explanation is it was pre staged on the roof. By who though is the question.
He had the stock in one pant leg and the barrel/scope in the other. The picture of him with the giant „cellphone“ imprint is the butt of the stock, and if you look at his side in that picture, you can see the imprint of the stock. That is why he walked with a limp in the surveillance footage from the house. The screwdriver and trigger mechanism were in his backpack. He jumped off the roof with the rifle in his hand and was trying to conceal it with a towel as he ran away. The bullet deflected off Charlie’s body armor and went into his neck deformed. That is why it looks like an exit wound.
The Charlie Kirk assassination by Israel story has been bombed down the memory hole by the MSM.
Why are we still talking about how the official narrative is full of holes?
Tyler’s just a scapegoat that’s becoming more and more obvious and demonstrates the FBI’s inability to solve the case in a professional and impartial manner.
Maybe Charlie Kirk’s assassination was an unsanctioned hit by the Mossad second string who were paid off the books by some zionist billionaire whose god complex is out of control.
How’s that for a conspiracy theory?
Edit: Oowie, downvotes. Hitting too close to home?
Ring camera videos show him limping substantially on his way to the event and not afterwards. Looks like he had it under his shirt and down the leg of his pants. This video means nothing.
Now the stock is camo?