Close Menu
    Unterhaltung

    Matt Reeves sagt, ‚The Batman 2‘ Bösewicht ist „noch nie in einem Film gemacht“

    Share.
    View 12 Comments

    12 Kommentare

    1. mcfw31 on

      > “[In] a lot of the other films, which I love, once you get past the origin tale, which we didn’t quite do, but we did something that referred to his origins, then you start telling the Rogues Gallery story and that character’s sort of arch,” Reeves said. “But I never wanted to lose [Robert Pattinson] at the center of these stories, and so that is really what we set our aim on.”

      > The “Cloverfield” director explained that the sequel’s new angle was a crucial consideration when selecting the villain. He teased that the antagonist for “The Batman Part II” has “never really been done in a movie before.”

    2. Wonderful_Grade_5476 on

      So either it’s firefly (I hope to god he’s fucking dope especially his The Batman early 2000s animated show and arkam game appearances) or man bat (we never got to see man or she bat nis my guess

    3. jazzmaster4000 on

      If it’s not the Condiment King from BTAS I’ll be nothing but disappointed

    5. JohnnyDerpington on

      First film, the riddler was just the green bastard from trailer park boys

    6. NeitherAlexNorAlice on

      Never been done in a movie doesn’t mean much considering all Batman movies just recycled the same four or five big villains over and over again.

    7. MainZack on

      I would assume Hush since there were some Easter eggs to him in the last movie.

    8. LeatherAdept670 on

      Fucking Clayface and forcing Robert Pattinson to reconcile that Batman has to embrace Bruce.

    11. Longjumping-Cress845 on

      Am i the only one that wants to see how they’ll work a serious Mr. Freeze live action?

    12. Janky_McSpaniels on

      I thought the end of the first one made it so riddler was the villain

    Leave A Reply