Share.

    21 Kommentare

    1. MARTINELECA on

      The best time to stop importing ruskie oil and gas was ten years ago, the second best time was three years ago, the third best time is now.

    2. Dismal-Attitude-5439 on

      This was a hard thing to do with the previous 2028 time frame, how do they propose to do it faster?

    3. RetryAgain9 on

      Oh good, another proposal which they’ll argue on for five years, before settling on a compromised version that’s half as effective while also increasing cost of living!

    4. AltruisticDealer4717 on

      It had been proposed since the beginning of the war yet here we are

    5. Nomorechildishshit on

      Proposals, urges, vows, strong condemnations. Thats words.

      About actions? EU is in a completely pathetic state, entirely dependent on the US. Cant even wipe its ass by itself.

    6. Any-Original-6113 on

      Now is a very good time, especially since there is an oversupply of oil and liquefied gas on the market.
      In addition, this is a support for green energy.

    7. Maybe it would be easier to just annex in Russia. It’s basically just one Kremlin in a single city to take over.

    8. CptnMillerArmy on

      They might give Hungary a free ticket too to leave the EU. The Union getting sick of them.

    9. dat_9600gt_user on

      **The Commission President also said that the 19th sanctions package targeting crypto, banks, and energy would be presented „soon“**

      The European Commission will propose speeding up the phase-out of Russian fossil imports, European Union executive head Ursula von der Leyen said on Tuesday, following a call with U.S. President Donald Trump aimed at intensifying economic pressure on Moscow.

      Von der Leyen announced the move in a post on social media platform X, emphasizing joint transatlantic efforts to curb Russia’s war funding more than three years into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

      “The Commission will soon present its 19th package of sanctions, targeting crypto, banks, and energy,” she wrote. “The Commission will propose speeding up the phase-out of Russian fossil imports,” she added, signalling a potential acceleration of the bloc’s existing timeline to end purchases of Russian oil and gas by 1 January 2028.

      The announcement comes amid heightened U.S. pressure on Europe to shoulder more responsibility in starving Russia’s war machine of revenue. Despite significant progress in reducing reliance on Russian energy – EU imports of Russian pipeline gas have plummeted by over 90% since 2021 – the bloc still buys billions of euros worth of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil products, and enriched uranium annually.

      These imports, valued at around €25 billion last year, continue to bolster Moscow’s coffers, even as the EU has diversified supplies through LNG terminals in Germany and Greece, and boosted imports from Norway and the United States.

      Trump’s recent rhetoric has sharpened this transatlantic divide. His “open letter to NATO nations and the world” posted on Sunday underscores a familiar strategy of exerting pressure on allies, demanding they halt all Russian oil purchases and impose steep tariffs on China to weaken Moscow’s economic lifeline in the Ukraine war.

      In the letter, Trump positions himself as the decisive peacemaker, ready to unleash “major sanctions” on Russia only if NATO members match his resolve, while blasting the alliance’s uneven commitment and ongoing energy imports as “shocking” betrayals that undermine negotiations. This blunt ultimatum – framed as a prerequisite for his intervention – shifts the burden squarely onto Europe and deflects attention from Trump’s failure to secure peace in Ukraine.

      The timing of Trump’s post was no coincidence. It followed a weekend of closed-door G7 discussions where U.S. officials, led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, reiterated demands for Europe to lead on energy sanctions. Bessent, in a Fox News interview aired Sunday, stated that the Trump administration would withhold additional tariffs on Chinese goods – aimed at curbing Beijing’s role as a top buyer of Russian oil – unless the EU first imposes punitive duties on both China and India, the world’s largest purchasers of discounted Russian crude.

      “Europe can’t keep asking us to do the heavy lifting while they sip Russian LNG,” Bessent said.

      The 19th sanctions package, originally slated for unveiling to EU envoys on Wednesday, was abruptly delayed on Monday. The holdup, first reported by Politico, stems from ongoing internal wrangling over how to align the measures with Trump’s demands without fracturing bloc unity.

    10. Malkariss888 on

      Yeah, no worries, the citizens (us) will just pay double the price for US gas… The plan is coming along nicely!

    11. MmmIceCreamSoBAD on

      EU policy is absolutely dreadful with Russia

      It got itself hooked to Russian energy despite warnings that it would eventually be used against them. And then here we are in year three of the war and the EU still hasn’t stopped doing huge amount of business with Russia.

      Last year EU members paid Russia more for energy than it gave to Ukraine in military aid. And I am fully convinced it will never embargo Russian energy before the war ends and after it ends, politicians will go back to normal with Russia and become hooked on its energy again before the next Russian war in Europe.

    12. Hopeful_Hat_3532 on

      Jesus Christ… About time.
      I know it’s not easy but to pay the very enemy that seeks to destroy us is just crazy af.

    13. classicjuice on

      All these years of poisoning political dissidents in UK, shooting down civilian aircraft with hundreds of EU citizens, invading multiple neighbouring countries and waging war, cyber attacks within EU, and NOW EU is proposing/mulling over/considering/pondering a faster phase out of russki energy.

      I have a feeling putler could walk into Brussels, pimp-slap Ursula and walk back in moscow while EU struggles to write a strongly worded letter for what he did.

    14. Grnd_Control on

      What it means financially for me as a Slovak citizen? I will not support anything that rises prices for single cent. If the different suppliers will be cheaper then Im all for it, but if that phase out means I need to pay higher bill then go fck yourself. I will be demanding my government not to support it.

    Leave A Reply