Dies ist eine Grafik, die zeigt, mit welchem Team jedes Team den schlechtesten Sieg -Rekord hat. Punkte gegen Tie Breaker, wenn sie den gleichen Rekord hatten
Should’ve had the W/L record on the x-axis instead the team name
Enslaved_M0isture on
least beautiful data i’ve ever seen, what is this sub even about anymore
RamsDevilsBlackhawks on
Was the worst matchup of this chart pixelation?
Heyohmydoohd on
hmm i think this photo has too many pixels you should jpeg it more
pedal-force on
This is the antithesis of this sub. It’s ugly *and* it doesn’t convey its data well.
CoyoteJoe412 on
Interesting data, but a confusing way to represent it. Also im wondering now how much this skews towards older teams appearing „better“ just because they’ve been around longer and played more games
KWNewyear on
Steelers fear Bears
Bears fear Texans
Texans fear Vikings
Vikings fear Colts
Colts fear Steelers
Absolute Parity!
FloridaGatorMan on
Don’t want to pile on but this is pretty rough… (edit) I just deleted a few bits of feedback. I’m baffled with why you went with this visualization. The only decipherable bit of information is which opponent each team has their worst record against.
That should be two columns if you’re not going to put the number of wins. There is no information gained between this and just listing the teams.
FlorinidOro on
Giants fan here…don’t you tease me!
Bbbq_byobb_1 on
Wow this is such a terrible graph. Absolutely no good info is displayed
Supergamera on
While I applaud this as a Texans fan, I think those teams have only played us a few (maybe 1-3) times, so we are 1-0 or possibly 2-1 against them.
Godzirrraaa on
Sorry but this could not be more ugly and confusing. One of the axes needs to be win percentage against.
i_made_reddit on
I’d say this is an interesting data point, but the organization keeps things way too linear and it’s sort of unnecessary. The length of the bars give some semblance of an idea that the bigger it is, the more impact it brought.
It’s just to get to the team name, which is also standard on the x axis.
To modify, a clean table with the logo of the team you’ve found would be just as insightful with less possibility to misread the graphic. If you want to keep the structure as is, then I would let the length of bar relate to the Win/Loss ratio for that team, organize it descending, and then summarize below the teams with the top, bottom ratios and any other interesting tid bits that could be pulled from it. Cool data set & idea!
i_made_reddit on
Also the Steelers are on there twice
clearly_not_an_alt on
Over what time frame is this? Seems odd that the Pats aren’t on anyone’s list.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
16 Kommentare
Cool concept but why so blurry
Should’ve had the W/L record on the x-axis instead the team name
least beautiful data i’ve ever seen, what is this sub even about anymore
Was the worst matchup of this chart pixelation?
hmm i think this photo has too many pixels you should jpeg it more
This is the antithesis of this sub. It’s ugly *and* it doesn’t convey its data well.
Interesting data, but a confusing way to represent it. Also im wondering now how much this skews towards older teams appearing „better“ just because they’ve been around longer and played more games
Steelers fear Bears
Bears fear Texans
Texans fear Vikings
Vikings fear Colts
Colts fear Steelers
Absolute Parity!
Don’t want to pile on but this is pretty rough… (edit) I just deleted a few bits of feedback. I’m baffled with why you went with this visualization. The only decipherable bit of information is which opponent each team has their worst record against.
That should be two columns if you’re not going to put the number of wins. There is no information gained between this and just listing the teams.
Giants fan here…don’t you tease me!
Wow this is such a terrible graph. Absolutely no good info is displayed
While I applaud this as a Texans fan, I think those teams have only played us a few (maybe 1-3) times, so we are 1-0 or possibly 2-1 against them.
Sorry but this could not be more ugly and confusing. One of the axes needs to be win percentage against.
I’d say this is an interesting data point, but the organization keeps things way too linear and it’s sort of unnecessary. The length of the bars give some semblance of an idea that the bigger it is, the more impact it brought.
It’s just to get to the team name, which is also standard on the x axis.
To modify, a clean table with the logo of the team you’ve found would be just as insightful with less possibility to misread the graphic. If you want to keep the structure as is, then I would let the length of bar relate to the Win/Loss ratio for that team, organize it descending, and then summarize below the teams with the top, bottom ratios and any other interesting tid bits that could be pulled from it. Cool data set & idea!
Also the Steelers are on there twice
Over what time frame is this? Seems odd that the Pats aren’t on anyone’s list.