Stupid law based on just propaganda. Consumers are not confused and also linguistically it makes little sense. For example meat in English comes from a Germanic root meaning food; Wurst means something that has been twisted, viande means (red) meat in French but vivanda in Italian has a much wider meaning.
Moral of the story: as society changes meanings shift and no-one is confused and this whole law is bollocks.
Prodiq on
Meat is meat, and vegetarian options are vegetarian options. I always found it weird that both producers and consumers would try to label a bunch cabbage as a chop (as in pork chop or something along those lines) or a big mushroom a steak or a veggie stew a lasagna etc.
CoronaSuperSpreader on
This is good. Vegetarian food has to get it’s own identity or will always be thought off as the inferior knockoff version of the classics.
Dapperrevolutionary on
Finally some common sense from the EU.
KernunQc7 on
Based, ultraprocessed slop should be banned outright. Real Meat is bad enough.
edit. R/Europe is very sensitive about their ultraprocessed slop „food“. Enjoy it while it lasts.
gwentlarry on
I distrust the term „plant based“.
To me, that means it contains quite a lot of plant ingredients but might also contain ingredients of animal origin.
Just because it is plant-based doesn’t necessarily mean it’s healthy or good for the environment – glucose, palm oil, coconut oil which is 90% saturated fats, almond milk imposes a huge demand on water resources …
What is wrong with vegetarian and vegan? Both have much clearer meanings.
„Plant-based“ is little more than marketing to try to persuade people to buy possibly more expensive processed foods which are little different from other processed foods.
Oriel_bound on
Populist nonsense.
eL_MoJo on
Again?!
John_Hater on
Oh noes, the „I can’t believe it’s not steak“ text is going away.
Beyllionaire on
Food industry lobbies are some of the most evil organizations that exist.
VigorousElk on
Ah yes, because the big ‚Veggie‘, ‚Plant‘ etc. terms on the packaging are too confusing for the poor consumers.
Who does this benefit other than the meat lobby?
_hhhnnnggg_ on
I find this funny, since the West is so behind in terms of vegan/vegetarian food in comparison to Asia or Africa. When I browse the vegan/vegetarian aisles, 90% of the stuff there is deep-fried, breaded food, steak or sausage. Even tofu isn’t good, you probably get better tofu in an Asian store. Like, come on, you can do better than that.
IncompetentPolitican on
That was one of the high priority votes. We had to solve this problem before anything else. Because, the meat industry was sad.
I hope the plant based industry just changes the names to something close. Its not steak, its steack.
sickdanman on
This is just plain old corruption – or „lobbying“ – by the meat industry
Incorrigible_Gaymer on
Ah yeah, bureaucrats heroically overcome problems that no one knew existed.
DotBlot_ on
Don’t they have anything better to do, geez …
snowsuit101 on
>“There is no data to support the argument that consumers are confused by plant-based burgers, sausages or any other alternative,” said Pinto. “Policymakers continue to bring up this non-issue, when it’s simply not a problem for citizens.”
I’m pretty sure however that this is another example of data to support the argument that corporate lobbies pushing for shit nobody else wants are alive and well in the EU.
Muted_Display6047 on
What a very important matter to spend time on
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
18 Kommentare
Stupid law based on just propaganda. Consumers are not confused and also linguistically it makes little sense. For example meat in English comes from a Germanic root meaning food; Wurst means something that has been twisted, viande means (red) meat in French but vivanda in Italian has a much wider meaning.
Moral of the story: as society changes meanings shift and no-one is confused and this whole law is bollocks.
Meat is meat, and vegetarian options are vegetarian options. I always found it weird that both producers and consumers would try to label a bunch cabbage as a chop (as in pork chop or something along those lines) or a big mushroom a steak or a veggie stew a lasagna etc.
This is good. Vegetarian food has to get it’s own identity or will always be thought off as the inferior knockoff version of the classics.
Finally some common sense from the EU.
Based, ultraprocessed slop should be banned outright. Real Meat is bad enough.
edit. R/Europe is very sensitive about their ultraprocessed slop „food“. Enjoy it while it lasts.
I distrust the term „plant based“.
To me, that means it contains quite a lot of plant ingredients but might also contain ingredients of animal origin.
Just because it is plant-based doesn’t necessarily mean it’s healthy or good for the environment – glucose, palm oil, coconut oil which is 90% saturated fats, almond milk imposes a huge demand on water resources …
What is wrong with vegetarian and vegan? Both have much clearer meanings.
„Plant-based“ is little more than marketing to try to persuade people to buy possibly more expensive processed foods which are little different from other processed foods.
Populist nonsense.
Again?!
Oh noes, the „I can’t believe it’s not steak“ text is going away.
Food industry lobbies are some of the most evil organizations that exist.
Ah yes, because the big ‚Veggie‘, ‚Plant‘ etc. terms on the packaging are too confusing for the poor consumers.
Who does this benefit other than the meat lobby?
I find this funny, since the West is so behind in terms of vegan/vegetarian food in comparison to Asia or Africa. When I browse the vegan/vegetarian aisles, 90% of the stuff there is deep-fried, breaded food, steak or sausage. Even tofu isn’t good, you probably get better tofu in an Asian store. Like, come on, you can do better than that.
That was one of the high priority votes. We had to solve this problem before anything else. Because, the meat industry was sad.
I hope the plant based industry just changes the names to something close. Its not steak, its steack.
This is just plain old corruption – or „lobbying“ – by the meat industry
Ah yeah, bureaucrats heroically overcome problems that no one knew existed.
Don’t they have anything better to do, geez …
>“There is no data to support the argument that consumers are confused by plant-based burgers, sausages or any other alternative,” said Pinto. “Policymakers continue to bring up this non-issue, when it’s simply not a problem for citizens.”
I’m pretty sure however that this is another example of data to support the argument that corporate lobbies pushing for shit nobody else wants are alive and well in the EU.
What a very important matter to spend time on