Share.

    37 Kommentare

    1. Boltzmann_head on

      The perpetrators names will be redacted to „protect them from harassment.“

    2. RobertoPaulson on

      Won’t the administration just keep anything they don’t want to get out? How would anyone even know if they held back stuff?

    3. „nudge“ lol. The petition has to get to 218 signatures. How many of those do you suppose will be Dem? Over 200 of them. That’s not a „nudge“, that’s doing the heavy lifting.

    4. AdAffectionate3143 on

      Anyone involved in the coverup of these files needs to be charged as an accessory. The people need to demand justice

    5. TheBeesBeesKnees on

      Just to make it clear for those who didn’t read the article, every single Democrat in the House (212/212) has signed on. 4/219 Republicans have signed on. There will be special elections in deep blue districts to fill vacancies that will give this petition more votes later this month.

      Every single Democrat has signed the discharge petition. Almost none of the Republicans have.

    6. How about we have a public hearing and allow the victims to share their stories for all to hear?
      I’m not interested in a redacted report from the current administration.

    7. glasshalfbeer on

      “Nudge” fuck the authors of this article. The Dems made it happen with a nudge from a few lone Republicans led by Thomas Massie

    8. jediporcupine on

      Special election candidates running on exposing the Epstein clients and releasing the Epstein files are set to win easily.

      I don’t know Johnson, maybe read the room?

    9. Searchlights on

      Democrats are lining up to be about 91% of the vote to pass it, but sanewashing requires that we refer to that a nudge as if the Republican party is leading the effort.

    10. bleat_bleat_bleat on

      If you vote against, or abstain from this , you’re a pedophile or a pedophile defender. Occam’s razor

    11. Okay so the thing about this discharge petition is it still would have to pass the Senate which it probably will but then it goes to the president and I am almost positive he will not sign this so then it goes back to Congress and I don’t believe that you’ll see any change and getting it passed to override veto.

    12. ProfessionalKey7356 on

      Call your elected officials people! Demand the release! Nudge them yourself!

    13. So they need 3-4 more Republicans to flip.

      How do we get the last handful of Republicans to sign on… and is there anything the Trump admin can do at that point to stop it?

    14. CanaDoug420 on

      So all the Dems vote for the release and only 3 republicans follow but that’s a nudge from the Dems?

    15. Intelligent_Bag_6705 on

      The longer this waits the more time there is for donors to get money into the pockets of Boebert, MTG, and Mace and then change their vote.

    16. InternetGamerFriend on

      Since no one seems to read the article, the discharge petition stays live until the end of the current Congress and needs just two signatures. There are currently four vacant seats in the House, three of which are in deep Blue districts. Two of those special elections will happen this month and both Democratic candidates have said they will sign the petition. The third is slated for Nov 4, so the petition could still pass if one Republican backs out.

    17. ShilgenVens01 on

      It’ll be interesting watching the reactions of Americans over the next few years when absolutely nothing happens to anyone on the list.

    18. What will happen if this discharge position passes and the House actually voted for it? Will the Senate act? Are there 60 votes to pass it in the Senate? And if it passes both chambers, and Trump vetoes it, then what? Can we actually get two-thirds of the House and Senate to override when we are barely even able to get a majority?

      I don’t ever see this happening. Someone needs to leak it.

    19. Basset_found on

      There’s zero chance they release anything that implicates Trump more than he’s already been implicated. Have you met Pam Bondi? They’ll literally just refuse and not abide by court orders. 

    20. Protecting pedos all to stay in power. Doesn’t matter what side you are on democrat or republican. If you are or were involved in this sick shit you need to go to jail

    21. AnAwkwardJedi on

      A nudge? You mean they’re bringing it 99% of the way and the handful of Republicans needed are giving it the “nudge.”

    22. NTXStarsFan on

      Didn’t the Senate majority leader already say he wouldn’t put it to a vote? Just name the names in the chamber already.

    23. Forsaken-Flow-209 on

      The fat head devil fucker is just going to veto it as soon as it hits his desk.

    24. >But there are currently four vacant seats in the House, and three of them cover deep blue districts where the Democrat is expected to prevail in special elections slated for later this year.

      Okay wait just a second. If there are four vacant seats that means there’s only 431 House members that can currently vote on anything. 216, the number of votes Massie and Khanna have, is more than half of that. There are currently only 215 that have not signed onto it. What the fuck?

    25. This feels like the easiest way to run against every single politician that voted to keep it away. Every response the same „My opponent protected people that SA’d children“. Repeat as needed.

    26. allenahansen on

      PLEASE contact your Republican Congressional representative and demand they sign the Massey/Khanna discharge petition. Tell them your vote depends on it and you’ll be watching them to see what they do. Oh, and Johnson’s Oversight Committee distraction dump doesn’t count.

    27. And, surprise, watch Republican signatures come off for „reasons“ as the others sign on.

    28. CoryOpostrophe on

      “TrUmpS noT in thEM whY arE you mAKinG thIs pOlITical?”

      Honestly, it’d probably be effective messaging to parrot it back at them, “yeah…? He’s not … in them. Why are we making this political? We should just release them to the get the bad guys!” 

    29. But it’ll only be the redacted list. Going to have to depend on another source

    30. It’s not going to accomplish anything. Trump controls the DOJ. We will never see the real files no matter what congress says.

      The only chance is in a democrat administration.

    31. randomnighmare on

      Why does this article’s title seem like it’s given Dems the least amount of credit for literally having all members voting to release the files to the public?

    Leave A Reply