Offizielle Top-DOJ-Verschüttungen Epstein-Vertuschungen Pläne für Honigtrap | Pam Bondis amtierender stellvertretender Chef wurde zu einem Datum der Pläne der Abteilung, die Epstein -Dateien zu verändern, gefilmt.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-doj-official-spills-jeffrey-epstein-cover-up-plans-to-honeytrap/

    Share.

    29 Kommentare

    1. Every democrat rep and senator should simultaneously post on their Twitter the video of Trump dancing with Epstein and looking at girls and all the pictures of Epstein and Melania hanging out.

      Do the simultaneous post every day at 10 am.

    2. This administration is insufferable. I have never seen a pedophile get such a massive outcry of support. I had no clue there were so many sympathizers for kid touchers

      Do you guys also miss Jared Fogle? Where is the cutoff for this shit?

    3. jediporcupine on

      Top DOJ official says the quiet part out loud. We already knew Patel had an army of FBI agents combing over the files for every Trump reference and this guy confirms why.

      They will redact the names of everyone in Trump’s orbit and even Trump himself.

      Quite the ploy for the “most transparent administration”

    4. A far right media organization honey trapped snuff exposed the lie of their chosen president? This gets more insane daily, I’m glad Canadian politics is known for being boring

    5. gorobotkillkill on

      If it sounds too good to be true, like a woman actually agreeing to a date with your dumb ass, it’s probably a honeypot.

    6. Our adversaries must really just not want to crash America atp because if they did, like how fucking easy would it be for real? Like at every single level these ppl are grossly incompotent.

    7. MajorMorelock on

      It’s easy to read through the blacked out redactions, here’s the key: All redacted names are Donald Trump, All redacted paragraphs are detailed descriptions of Trump raping a child.

    8. newtohomebrewing on

      How is this not to be found at the top of every news page? I checked Fox News’ website – no reference to it. OK, that doesn’t surprise me. I checked CNN, I didn’t find it either. Wait, what?!?!?

    9. I can only imagine the random stuff they blab to foreign spies when they will give up information like this to their tinder dates.

    10. I know there are pieces of shit that want power and are obsessed with hating the other political party, but to actively and confidently state that if there are Republicans in the Epstein files, people who may have raped minors, they will just redacted their names, because protecting all Republicans is more important to them than NOT supporting rapists, is a level of disgusting that I never would have thought this would have gotten too.

      He’s not even bothered by openly admitting this to another person, he is proud of it. The DOJ will cover up rapes for all Republicans……just to stick it to the Libs. Sad thing is, the MAGA Right MIGHT be mad after learning this, but not enough to stop supporting Trump and his administration’s coverup. They don’t care when kids get shot, so they sure as hell don’t give a fuck if they got raped.

    11. „Guys, guys!! He is the **Acting** Deputy Chief. *Acting*… guys. He was *acting*. That is what he is here for. None of that was real, he was *acting*.

      And isn’t he good at it?!?! You all believed him!“ – Pam Bondi (probably soon).

    12. ONE_PUMP_ONE_CREAM on

      This journalist is coming from Project Veritas by the way, a far right media company.

    13. flimflammed on

      The Epstein files that don’t exist and are also a Democrat hoax? Those Epstein files that without any question include Trump’s name?

    14. WarbossTodd on

      Correction. These are the Trump-Epstein files. Please refer to them as such.

    15. A MAGA guy bragging about how they are bribing a child trafficker/rapist’s co-conspirator and censoring incriminating evidence to protect other pedophiles of their political affiliation to impress his date is about as on-brand as this gets for MAGA.

    Leave A Reply