Share.

    48 Kommentare

    1. I’m surprised they’re just going to redact them. I figured they would replace every name they want to protect with someone they want to smear.

    2. Natoochtoniket on

      When evidence is suppressed or altered, the opposing party in the litigation gets to make whatever inference they want. If „every Republican“ name is redacted from the Epstein evidence, they can legitimately infer that ***every Republicans name*** was actually present in each of those redactions.

    3. Farts_constantly on

      Not surprising, but the amount of brazen corruption is just so disgusting and astounding. I feel like a need a shower now.

    4. Orwells_Roses on

      „They’ll redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people,“ he told the reporter, who was undercover during the encounter, according to the video…

      „…Maxwell’s transfer „is against BOP policy because she’s a convicted sex offender,“ Schnitt said in the video. „The DOJ’s offering her something to keep her mouth shut.“

      He would know.

    5. DaBingeGirl on

      On hidden camera. Great. Please, someone will leak the names. Making sex trafficking and who knows whatever Epstein was involved in political is just disgusting. I’m for going after anyone who was involved, how they can protect people simply because they’re in the same political party is beyond me, but not surprising.

      All that said, my primary interest with Epstein is how he got connected to Wexner and any connections to Israeli intelligence. I have sympathy for the victims, but given his connections, it seems like this goes well beyond just sex, the amount of blackmail material and how that may have been used really needs to be made public.

    6. So you’re admitting there are Republicans on the list.

      Anyways, default assumption, 100% of Republicans are on the list. If they want to read the list out to prove me wrong though, go ahead.

    7. 1cat2dogs1horse on

      I doubt the women that were abused care what the political affiliations their abusers had. Pretty sure their list will reflect that.

    8. 2_Spicy_2_Impeach on

      >“In a statement addressed to the DOJ’s acting director, Schnitt said that he had no idea he was being recorded and that he met the O’Keefe reporter — who he said was pretending to be an au pair — on Hinge.“

      Must have fucked up if James O’Keefe turns on you. Also doesn’t initially sound like this is his usual out of context mashups. Just a guy straight blabbing to someone he thinks is innocuous.

      Also, this doesn’t really help as an excuse considering he’s **Department of Justice’s acting deputy chief**:

      >“The „comments in this video have absolutely zero bearing with reality and reflect a total lack of knowledge of the DOJ’s review process,“ the department’s public affairs account said. „

    9. Grantagonist on

      > Why it matters: The O’Keefe Media Group, a far-right media organization, secretly recorded acting deputy Joseph Schnitt’s comments and published them on Wednesday, in a move that represents just how large a rift the Epstein case has created between President Trump’s administration and his MAGA base.

      _O’Keefe_ broke this? What is happening to reality

    10. KilroyLeges on

      I love how his response is to blame the person who recorded him for being shady. Sure, the Project Veritas people are dishonest assholes and he had no idea they were recording him. He still said all of these things. I’m sure he will be fired by DOJ in the next 24 hours.

    11. Toy_Guy_in_MO on

      So the smart assumption is if you see a redacted name, it’s a well-known Republican.

    12. a cover up by any other name is still a coverup, and makes that person a co-conspirator to the original crime.

    13. CynicalSigtyr on

      Then every Republican is on the list. Easy.

      Certainly those voting to protect pedophiles.

    14. ImLikeReallySmart on

      >In a statement addressed to the DOJ’s acting director, Schnitt said that he had no idea he was being recorded and that he met the O’Keefe reporter — who he said was pretending to be an au pair — on Hinge.

      Whooooa, O’Keefe, really?

      >“Had I a clue, the first date would have ended immediately and there never would have been a second one,“ Schnitt wrote.

      Uh… interesting defense. I don’t think that’s the part people will have a problem with.

    15. See this is what has always confused me. They have been fighting so hard to not release anything, when they could have just redacted or outright removed the names they wanted out in the first place. I mean, it would be pretty clear to everyone (well, except for maga) that it was doctored for political goals, but once it was out there they could say everything else was national security or some other flimsy bullshit excuse and the world would move on.

    16. FluidFisherman6843 on

      The admission here is that he has seen the files and there are a shit load of republicans and conservatives in the Epstein files.

    17. All it takes is a couple of names to come out .. either political or non political.. one of them is going to try to save their own ass and say other names .. so just release them and get it over with.. because at this point i think anyone who doesn’t want the list to come out is on the list or is a pedo

    18. thathurtcsr on

      Guess that’s why they cant release it. Empty sheet of paper would be suspicious

    19. ValuableOffice9040 on

      Can’t wait till this child fucker dies. The truth that will come out will astound the world.

    20. WafflePartyOrgy on

      So bottom line: are Trump supporters cool with only Republicans raping kids and running the world’s most prolific high-scale child sex ring like it is legal since they won’t only never face prosecution, but will literally receive blanket immunity from ever even revealing their involvement … from the leading party of the United States government.

      Are they? I’m honestly not sure, so it’s not a rhetorical question.

    21. They are not even trying to hide the deception at this point. The Republican Party will attempt to eliminate elections before 2028!

    22. acute_dilemma99 on

      This is our new Dept. of Justice?

      This like the scenario where the Nazis actually won WW2.

    23. Groundbreaking-Ice12 on

      So now it’s a hoax that involves only democrats created by democrats….got it

    24. the victims plan to release a list, so good luck trying to redact anything in that!

    25. space_coder on

      Breaking news: DOJ Deputy Chief admits in secret that there are a lot of pedophiles in the GOP.

    26. JuniorEmu2629 on

      I’m begging someone to please crosspost this to the Conservative sub. I’m banned

    27. MiddleAgedSponger on

      At this point anyone who has seen the files, knows the names and hasn’t released them is complicit with child rape.

      Although republicans are worse, the democrats have had their opportunities to expose this and have decided not to.

    28. What were those 1000 FBI agents doing if not redacting every Republican name? You mean to tell me it took them a month and they could only get Trump’s name out?

    29. ShamelessCatDude on

      I’m not going to even read the “official” list. I want to hear the list the victims wrote. I’d rather believe the people it happened to than the people who lie for a living

    30. basicwhitelich on

      So we can assume that all the redacted names are republican then? I dont think this is gonna work out how they think.

    31. Ones name being in these files, or any others, does not imply guilt. Context and circumstance make the difference. When your name is removed it is because of the context and circumstance in which it appears. The inference of the removal of every republican mentioned in the files is one of guilt. 

    32. CitySeekerTron on

      Oddly, I don’t see any qanon followers threatening an pizza restaurants over this.

      Can’t be a conspiracy theory when they’re making it seem more like conspiracy fact. 

    33. Assume every Republican that’s been in office between 1990-2016 is a Pedophile.

    Leave A Reply