>Court documents show Daniel Senecal, 25, was found guilty of sexual assault in a Sept. 2021 incident and ordered to comply with the Sex Offender Information Registration Act as one of the conditions for release in March 2024.
>He was initially charged with sexual assault, sexual interference of a person under 16 and attempt to strangle during sexual assault in a Sept. 25, 2021 incident, in Welland, Ont.
>In Dec. 2023, Senecal was found guilty of sexual assault and was acquitted of the attempt to strangle charge. The sexual interference charge was stayed in accordance with [R. v. Kineapple, a 1974](https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/4274/index.do) case that found that “where a lack of consent has been proved, age ceases to be a distinguishing factor between the two offences” and that “nobody can be convicted more than once in respect of the same act.”
>Senecal was released in March 2024 with conditions, including an order to comply with the Sex Offender Information Registration Act for 20 years.
Three months for the sexual assault of a minor. Another feather in the cap for the rehabilitation, restorative justice fanatics.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
2 Kommentare
Why was he free in the community early after his last sexual assault on a child? This is the fault of the judge and the entire „justice system.“
[https://globalnews.ca/news/11390550/break-and-enter-sexual-assault-child-previous-charges/](https://globalnews.ca/news/11390550/break-and-enter-sexual-assault-child-previous-charges/)
>Court documents show Daniel Senecal, 25, was found guilty of sexual assault in a Sept. 2021 incident and ordered to comply with the Sex Offender Information Registration Act as one of the conditions for release in March 2024.
>He was initially charged with sexual assault, sexual interference of a person under 16 and attempt to strangle during sexual assault in a Sept. 25, 2021 incident, in Welland, Ont.
>In Dec. 2023, Senecal was found guilty of sexual assault and was acquitted of the attempt to strangle charge. The sexual interference charge was stayed in accordance with [R. v. Kineapple, a 1974](https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/4274/index.do) case that found that “where a lack of consent has been proved, age ceases to be a distinguishing factor between the two offences” and that “nobody can be convicted more than once in respect of the same act.”
>Senecal was released in March 2024 with conditions, including an order to comply with the Sex Offender Information Registration Act for 20 years.
Three months for the sexual assault of a minor. Another feather in the cap for the rehabilitation, restorative justice fanatics.