Ich bin davon überzeugt, dass dieses Video (aus irgendeinem Grund) als Hölle falsch ausgegeben wird. Pause das Video. Beachten Sie verzerrte Gesichter, seltsame Beleuchtung auf Gesichtern, seltsame Finger, die Schilder halten. Ich bin überzeugt, dass dieses „Konzert“ -Material KI ist. Das letzte Foto war das, das mich brachte. Zahlreiche Gesichter sehr deutlich verzerrt.

    Von zippity__zoppity

    Share.

    24 Kommentare

    1. VeryFurryFurby on

      Agreed, also super unbelievable so many people would give a crap about Will Smith.

    2. Th3_Admiral_ on

      I feel like the circles were totally unnecessary because everything outside of the circles also screams AI. There isn’t a single face in any one of these pictures that looks 100% real. They all have some weird detail that is wrong.

    3. It was a mistake in my opinion, he should wait 5-10 more years, then it will be way harder to see AI and we will see fully fabricated events and concerts, im quite sure some celibrities will use that to gain money with royalties from entertainment industries, next step will be to create a new star that actually don’t exist at all, just to get full profit on anything they want.

    4. Lost_Pollution_6782 on

      Why would anyone care about a random American 90s actor. He isn’t even that amazing of an actor

    5. FormerlyMauchChunk on

      Zoom in on the faces of people in the background. They’re all hideous mutants. AI for sure.

      Will Smiff is not the king of chivalry and a rap legend.

    6. Fit-Produce420 on

      In the first photo there’s 2 ladies and a dude all wearing the exact same pair of glases in the upper left corner.

    7. I mean- look at the last picture. Zoom in on the middle rows and check out their faces. Thats not camera artifacts from motion. That’s pure ai fuckery

    8. This is too funny….but sad. Why can’t he go out a cool actor who has made a lot of money off acting. He seems unwell.

    9. Breaking news, water is wet. He has been taking shit for this being AI for like a week lol

    10. lokiandbutters on

      Oh, yeah, i read an article about it on a non-conspiracy related sub. Even mainstream media knows it’s A.I.

    11. Pluto_in_Reverse on

      Very definitely AI.

      A few other non-obvious (as in melted faces/too many fingers) tells are:

      * Every individual face is too well lit (makes sense since the bulk of AIs training data comes from professionally shot tv/film/stock photos
      * Nobody in the crowd is caught mid-motion, (like someone who was turning their head right as the photo was being taken) which would look like a smear of that person’s motion in that moment.
      * Not *enough* people are recording on their cellphones. This makes sense when you consider the earlier point about AI’s training data coming from professionally shot materials: a director/AD is going to look at a shot where every single background extra is on their cell phone and think it looks boring/ugly. So they would comb through those extras and have some of them have phones up and others reacting. This is great for a movie but is not realistic for real life. Ask anybody who has been to a concert since 2023, an insane amount of ppl will have their phones out the entire time.
      * And on this point, notice how in the second photo, none of the foreground people have their phones out, but all of the people in the back do WITH FLASH ON. Again, sounds like a lovely shot if youre filming a movie, but thats not realistic.
      * This one might be a bit of a stretch to some, but imo theres also too many ‚recording people‘ who have their phones in landscape mode. Landscape mode is easier for a computer to generate (usually people record in landscape with just one hand, while portrait mode you typically see people using both hands, one to hold and one to stabilize.) so it makes sense the AI would default to the ‚path of least action.‘ However, this imo i just not realistic AT ALL. Most people have their phone locked on portrait mode. Most social media sites are geared towards the portrait mode dimension, and so thats what most people have adopted as standard for video.

      And im sure theres many other tells, but imo the biggest tell which will last the longest going forward is: AI videos which *try to depict organic, real-world moments* (a concert, a busy street, etc) *but look/feel more like a TV show* in terms of the lighting, the camera angle, the camera’s motion [like a simulated dolly], how background people are behaving [are they acting like tv/film extras of are they acting like regular people who might not even know theyre being filmed?], etc.

    12. PassTheCowBell on

      Oh yeah notice how it can’t handle human eyes very well and just does its best to make it look like they can’t be seen very well in the photo.

      This is 100% AI

    13. There’s so much wrong with the last picture you could write a whole book about it. I kept scrolling to different spots and busting out laughing.

    14. WhyYesIndeedIDo on

      I wish this sub allowed photo comments for this thread, there’s some good ones in there lol

    Leave A Reply