It’s interesting that many conservative people are claiming that progressive ideas or the diversity of the LGBTQ+ community is trying to „indoctrinate“ society while they are actually not shying away from trying to indoctrinate people by forcing their religion unto others.
It’s even worse when it is the „Minister of Family Services“ that is doing that.
Coffeedemon on
What the hell? Can these people be any more transparently Trojan horses for American takeovers? Tours of your legislature now? Wild. How do the freedom folk rectify this with their empty talk?
[deleted] on
[removed]
Routine_Soup2022 on
Makes you wonder what else is happening late at night when cameras are off in the Alberta legislature.
I don’t have a problem with religion but there are rules for what can happen in the legislature. Within the same article he’s said no rules were broken and that he’ll follow proper procedure in future so which is it?
I do have a problem with Sean Feucht because he’s practically a MAGA ambassador, never mind religion, but he’s in the right province and with the right UCP officials to be on friendly territory there.
Most of his appearances out east had to happen on private property after having permits cancelled for this exact reason.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
4 Kommentare
It’s interesting that many conservative people are claiming that progressive ideas or the diversity of the LGBTQ+ community is trying to „indoctrinate“ society while they are actually not shying away from trying to indoctrinate people by forcing their religion unto others.
It’s even worse when it is the „Minister of Family Services“ that is doing that.
What the hell? Can these people be any more transparently Trojan horses for American takeovers? Tours of your legislature now? Wild. How do the freedom folk rectify this with their empty talk?
[removed]
Makes you wonder what else is happening late at night when cameras are off in the Alberta legislature.
I don’t have a problem with religion but there are rules for what can happen in the legislature. Within the same article he’s said no rules were broken and that he’ll follow proper procedure in future so which is it?
I do have a problem with Sean Feucht because he’s practically a MAGA ambassador, never mind religion, but he’s in the right province and with the right UCP officials to be on friendly territory there.
Most of his appearances out east had to happen on private property after having permits cancelled for this exact reason.