[OC] Top 10 Nationalitäten, die Asyl in Großbritannien im Jahr bis Juni 2025 auf dem Weg zum Eintritt nach Großbritannien beanspruchen, in Großbritannien
[OC] Top 10 Nationalitäten, die Asyl in Großbritannien im Jahr bis Juni 2025 auf dem Weg zum Eintritt nach Großbritannien beanspruchen, in Großbritannien
Several of these countries are not at war and are pretty stable. What basis are these people claiming asylum under? E.g. India, Vietnam.
Pakistan is questionable too, and Iran besides dissidents.
DandyWiner on
Source? And define what falls under irregular arrivals or other?
Fdr-Fdr on
No source given for the data. Immediate fail.
Notoriouslydishonest on
I’d like to see this broken down by gender and age
thesvenisss on
I’d like to see the breakdown of what the claim for asylum is based on e.g. war, sexual orientation, political etc.
viking196 on
There is no war in Pakistan?
wayfarer87x on
Worth a reflection on the impact of 10+ years of the Hostile Environment and the complete erosion of legitimate pathways into the country that has forced so many people to enter the country ‘irregularly’. Any conversation focusing on data of arrivals without consideration of how policy has driven this data is inherently flawed.
blompo on
Seeking free shit, they are not running from war nor from political oppression. They are running from a shithole they created themselves mostly, and now want to spread their shithole ways around the world.
ozneoknarf on
At all of all these Afghanistan, Sudan and maybe Kurds and Druze and Syria are the only ones with a valid claim for asylum
How do Pakistanis claim they’re in danger? Overstaying a visa should not be a valid method of claiming asylum, ever.
Ivanov_94 on
Nice one, well done. Most of these people need to be sent back!
whodafadha on
Why do Pakistanis need to claim asylum?
alwaystooupbeat on
I lived in the UK for years. This is unsurprising.
For a deeper dive though, for data visualization, it would be ideal to see *why* they seek asylum, and how often they’re accepted. For example, about 48% apply under reasons for violence and fear for their lives due to specific rights being violated. Specific, targeted, and documented threat from a violent group is the main reason cited. Under these circumstances, about 50% of all Pakistanis are actually successful in their asylum application.
I’d also like to add that Afghanistan is a special case, and is misleading in this graph- their visas aren’t normal. The UK started a new system specifically for Afghanis via the ARAP pathways, specifically for people who were largely either UK government employees who helped the UK government, and therefore at severe risk, or contracted by the UK government, or provided goods/services to the UK in Afghanistan, and are at risk. The legislated reason is simple: they helped save the lives of UK soldiers in one of the most dangerous countries on the planet, and after withdrawal, many fled and sought refuge with the people they helped. This is why they have a 96% acceptance rate.
Iranians are also highly likely to get asylum (87%), mostly because a lot of the applicants are either religious minorities with credible threats to their life, democracy activists, or LGBTQ. The last statistic I saw was about 70% of applications fall under this category. I saw a report that said that Christians are specifically targeted in 2024 for made up charges.
One more thing: Indians have the absolute lowest chances of getting asylum granted- about 2%. It’s unknown why this is the case, as I couldn’t find the grounds under which they were applying.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
15 Kommentare
Several of these countries are not at war and are pretty stable. What basis are these people claiming asylum under? E.g. India, Vietnam.
Pakistan is questionable too, and Iran besides dissidents.
Source? And define what falls under irregular arrivals or other?
No source given for the data. Immediate fail.
I’d like to see this broken down by gender and age
I’d like to see the breakdown of what the claim for asylum is based on e.g. war, sexual orientation, political etc.
There is no war in Pakistan?
Worth a reflection on the impact of 10+ years of the Hostile Environment and the complete erosion of legitimate pathways into the country that has forced so many people to enter the country ‘irregularly’. Any conversation focusing on data of arrivals without consideration of how policy has driven this data is inherently flawed.
Seeking free shit, they are not running from war nor from political oppression. They are running from a shithole they created themselves mostly, and now want to spread their shithole ways around the world.
At all of all these Afghanistan, Sudan and maybe Kurds and Druze and Syria are the only ones with a valid claim for asylum
How about we just remove asylum as an option?
Mostly from Islamist or Communist countries.
The [Red-Green Alliance](https://www.start.umd.edu/publication/emerging-red-green-alliance-where-political-islam-meets-radical-left) makes more sense now: they work together to destroy societies and send people fleeing.
How do Pakistanis claim they’re in danger? Overstaying a visa should not be a valid method of claiming asylum, ever.
Nice one, well done. Most of these people need to be sent back!
Why do Pakistanis need to claim asylum?
I lived in the UK for years. This is unsurprising.
For a deeper dive though, for data visualization, it would be ideal to see *why* they seek asylum, and how often they’re accepted. For example, about 48% apply under reasons for violence and fear for their lives due to specific rights being violated. Specific, targeted, and documented threat from a violent group is the main reason cited. Under these circumstances, about 50% of all Pakistanis are actually successful in their asylum application.
See figure 4:
[https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/migration-to-the-uk-asylum/](https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/migration-to-the-uk-asylum/)
I’d also like to add that Afghanistan is a special case, and is misleading in this graph- their visas aren’t normal. The UK started a new system specifically for Afghanis via the ARAP pathways, specifically for people who were largely either UK government employees who helped the UK government, and therefore at severe risk, or contracted by the UK government, or provided goods/services to the UK in Afghanistan, and are at risk. The legislated reason is simple: they helped save the lives of UK soldiers in one of the most dangerous countries on the planet, and after withdrawal, many fled and sought refuge with the people they helped. This is why they have a 96% acceptance rate.
[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/afghan-relocations-and-assistance-policy/afghan-relocations-and-assistance-policy-information-and-guidance](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/afghan-relocations-and-assistance-policy/afghan-relocations-and-assistance-policy-information-and-guidance)
Iranians are also highly likely to get asylum (87%), mostly because a lot of the applicants are either religious minorities with credible threats to their life, democracy activists, or LGBTQ. The last statistic I saw was about 70% of applications fall under this category. I saw a report that said that Christians are specifically targeted in 2024 for made up charges.
One more thing: Indians have the absolute lowest chances of getting asylum granted- about 2%. It’s unknown why this is the case, as I couldn’t find the grounds under which they were applying.