Share.

    36 Kommentare

    1. AdrenochromeDream on

      I bet Donald „Diddles Children“ Trump doesn’t want to release the evidence fingering child traffickers and rapists for who they are because he, in fact, is a child trafficker and rapist (of children).

    2. Happy_Landmine on

      He is, why are we pretending it’s even a question? Dude’s a known pedophile, full stop.

    3. Medium_Cod6579 on

      Are there any people that Trump has had a longer, more public relationship with than Jeffrey Epstein? He isn’t just *in* the files; he’s likely the central figure outside of Maxwell and Epstein.

    4. Troll_in_the_Knoll on

      So, which is it? Trump’s name are in the files, or the US Department of Justice and FBI were lying when they concluded that Epstein didn’t have a so-called client list.

    5. Can we suspend any further presidenting until we get this trump being a child rapist business sorted out?

      Pretty sure we should also nullify any of his actions so far. To include vacating any of his picks for positions, especially vice president.

      Should make sure the gop gets f*cked too. “Mike J doesn’t get to take over because he covers for pedophiles” or something like that.

    6. It’s time to understand that there is no way they are going to release files with his name in it. They’ve had long enough to alter or remove that info and this is all political theater to sweep yet another scandal under the rug.

    7. CurrentlyLucid on

      The level of denial is like a tidal wave, yes he is implicated. Release the Epstein evidence, unredacted except victim names.

    8. miaabeckerrr on

      Wild how every week it’s a new Trump scandal Epstein ties, praising Netanyahu as a ‘war hero,’ Bondi swimming in gifts and instead of addressing any of it, the guy’s White House is busy memeing with Putin. Meanwhile Newsom is literally beating him at his own troll game. 2025 politics feels like a fever dream.

    9. OfficialDCShepard on

      Centrists like Pod Save America keep dismissing the “distraction from Epstein drumbeat” as condescending, being condescending while doing so.

      [This is the first episode](https://youtu.be/ESJAG9Xb2GY?si=xNKkbgxaHygW3oUK) I’ve listened to since the election, and I have to say the snootiness about distractions is not it. We can talk about more than one thing at the same time, and can absolutely say that he’s scared and that to distract from the Epstein Files and his terrible performance on the economy that matters to YOU he’s putting on Fascist Dinner Theater for his fascionistas (people who cosplay at fascism but don’t really want a fight against people who fight back) that’s STILL hurting people who can’t fight back, so we need to keep the pressure on all fronts.

      Remember, dictators, religious cult leaders and other authoritarians are CATS- they Consolidate power constantly, feel Ascendant with no opponents, make Tinpot mistakes without accurate information (the Dictator’s Dilemma), try to keep their power at all costs and make more Tinpot mistakes doing so (the Dictator’s Doom Loop) and get STOPPED when there are too many opponents, scandals etc. from too many angles whether that be internal or external.

      All. Of. The Above. Strategy.

      I could see how “It’s JUST a distraction” could sound dismissive without tying it into the larger narrative I’ve been mentioning that he’s flailing and looking for constant new stories to bury old ones which is his MO, but the opposite is also reductive. Yes, he’s doing a lot of these things that are hurting people (trust me, I hate the idea of DC occupied, I live there and gender-affirming care not being an option for federal employees among other things) simply to be cruel, or for some other reason, and I do plan on highlighting those. Still the way the guys sounded talking about it also sounds like each thing needs to primarily be discussed in isolation and that’s frustrating when a lot of the administration’s actions ARE ALSO being driven by attempting to move on from child rape, and focusing too much on each individual action without seeing the larger pattern was detrimental to holding him accountable last time. Hence why we have to hammer him from all angles all the time now.

    10. Shinobi_WayOfTomoe on

      You best start believing in the epstein files Mr Trump…. You’re in them

    11. absolutelynotagoblin on

      We knew this already. Stop debating what we know (Trump is in the files, Trump raped and groped kids, Trump got his jollies watching underage contestants undress, Trump has a huge thing for his daughter and would totally fuck her). Let’s address what the eff we’re going to do about it. There is a mountain of evidence that Trump fucks around. Time for him to find out.

    12. Recent-Ad-5493 on

      It sure looks like the sky is blue every fuckin day there aren’t clouds in the sky.

      What the hell is this?

    13. BudgetEmotional9644 on

      “He’s not in the file”

      “If he is, then it’s not a big deal.”

    14. flirtmcdudes on

      was it the mountains of evidence pointing towards that theory? Or just his actions?

    15. The_Sad_Developer on

      The diddler in chief is 100% in the files, not just as a “guest” to Epsteins island but as a co conspirator. Fuck that man and fuck the shit he’s doing to this country. 

    16. backtocabada on

      and his name must appear often . this is taking a lot of time. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SEEN IT/KNOW THE TRUTH?

    17. mangoboi440 on

      Guys, I don’t think in any material way this is going to matter. I don’t like that at all. But this feels and awful lot like when people started buying Mueller Time merch.

    18. K but what’s he guilty of?…

      Again, show us the evidence. What a joke you whiners are.

      If you can’t wait for hearings maybe you don’t deserve real justice.

    19. Unlikely_Ant_950 on

      You know, I had to stare directly into the sun today to know it was there, so I get it.

    20. CrippleSlap on

      If you weren’t in the Epstein files, wouldn’t you do *everything* you could to clear your name?

    21. „I haven’t seen anything“ is a long, long way from „there isn’t anything‘.

    Leave A Reply