Das Ersticken von Waldbränden ist weitaus gefährlicher als bisher angenommen, wobei die Zahl der Todesopfer durch kurzfristige Exposition gegenüber feinen Partikeln um 93%unterschätzt wird.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/19/wildfire-smoke-far-more-dangerous-than-thought-say-scientists

    Share.

    3 Kommentare

    1. >“Previously, people assumed the same toxicity for wildfire particles and all particles,” said Prof Cathryn Tonne, an environmental epidemiologist at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) and co-author of the study.
      >
      >“Our paper shows evidence that – although it happens less often – the health impact for the same amount of particles is stronger for wildfire particles,” she added.

      >Using models that account for an expected lag in deaths, they found exposure to wildfire smoke increased the risk of death in the following week.
      >
      >For every extra microgram of PM2.5 fouling 1 cubic metre of air, they found that all-cause mortality rose by 0.7%, respiratory mortality went up by 1% and cardiovascular mortality rose by 0.9%.

      [Quantifying the short-term mortality effects of wildfire smoke in Europe: a multicountry epidemiological study in 654 contiguous regions – The Lancet Planetary Health](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(25)00174-3/fulltext)

    2. Leading_Watercress45 on

      Wisconsin air quality has been among nation’s worst as Canadian wildfire smoke spreads.

    Leave A Reply