"In China betreiben fünf Unternehmen 2.300 Robotaxis in 30 Städten. In den USA betreibt Waymo, der einzige Fahrpreis, der über 700 solcher Fahrzeuge in fünf Städten betreibt. Wie bei EVS behandelt China AVs als strategische Industrie und hat die nationale Regierungspolitik vorantreiben. Lokale Regierungen in Städten wie Peking, Shanghai und Shenzhen konkurrieren um die Einrichtung von Pilotzonen, bieten F & E-Subventionen, schnelle Genehmigungen und bauen städtische Straßen, auf denen fahrerlose Autos einfacher navigieren können."

    Es ist eine vertraute Geschichte. Das chinesische Modell des staatlich gerichteten Kapitalismus scheint einfach besser zu sein als der Ansatz des westlichen „Urlaubs“. Es war einmal, dass die westliche Welt den Chinesen sagte, sie solle sich an ihnen modellieren, um voranzukommen. Ich vermute, dass das Gegenteil in Zukunft passieren wird. Der Rest der Welt muss der chinesischen Version des Kapitalismus eher wie vorwärts gehen. Die meisten von uns wollen das jedoch nicht, wenn es mit einheimischen CCPs, Autokratie und Diktatoren einhergeht.

    Chinas Vision für eine fahrerlose Zukunft liegt meilenweit vor allen anderen

    Will 2025 be remembered as the year China took over as the 21st century's global leader in science and technology? It feels like it. Here's yet another sci-tech area where it's taking the lead – self-driving vehicles.
    byu/lughnasadh inFuturology

    Share.

    9 Kommentare

    1. kicksledkid on

      No, because it didn’t happen in 2025. The groundwork has been laid for a decade now.

    2. The Chinese model of state-directed capitalism was the kind of hybrid model that the West had before it was torn apart in the 80s. In France they called that „dirigiste“.

      There is no need to adopt the autocracy and a one party system to have that. Also let’s be real with „the markets“ being the arbiter of all things these days it’s the same autocracy just that the dictators work via the stock market. What was that wonderful term that was popular during the crisis T.I.N.A. ?

    3. 3rdPoliceman on

      China is either a glorious ascendant nation flying on wings of clean energy and lifting the world with virtuous industry or a devilish thieving den of manipulation, coercion, and corruption that the world must unite to thwart. Those are the two choices, sorry!

    4. It’ll be one of the global leaders, but not necessarily the overall leader.

    5. 5minArgument on

      Probably was earlier, but 2025 is definitely the year America tapped out.

      So unfortunate. China was comfortably looking back at the US in their rear view mirror until Biden era investment bills showed our country’s commitment to remain competitive.

      Depressingly, in the new Trump era we have elected tossing all that out the window.

    6. Yes and no. Theyre making a lot of progress despite the obstacles that the US has levied against them. If they had access to the latest silicon, they’d be way further ahead. I think AI will become the most powerful double edged sword and think its a legit race between countries at this point. 

    7. They will still be using the same tech support in India though so is it really India being the leader?

    Leave A Reply