Menschen haben oft die Auswirkungen von Klimaentscheidungen falsch berechnet – wie der Besitz eines Hundes -, heißt es in der Studie
https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/climate-choices-dog-planes-1.7608247
Menschen haben oft die Auswirkungen von Klimaentscheidungen falsch berechnet – wie der Besitz eines Hundes -, heißt es in der Studie
https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/climate-choices-dog-planes-1.7608247
6 Kommentare
[removed]
Yeah this has always been the case.
This sort of knowledge imbalance was exactly what the carbon tax was designed to address.
It’s really unfortunate that the CPC poisoned the well so thoroughly and effectively that it killed the best shot we had of reducing emissions in Canada.
Or flying a private jet around the world, like we would consider going to the corner store.
The ultra rich generate most of the problem, either in lifestyle or ge eating their wealth the get morons like this to tell us how having a dog is killing the planet.
Tax the ultra rich our of existence or we will all suffer, regardless of how few pets we have.
He does reference flying, but only passenger planes, not private jets.
Pers rarely make logical sense. But neither does having kids! They are little climate destroyers as well. But there is more to just the climate to consider with pets and kids.
[removed]
They should have also mentioned having fewer children. That has to be of the largest ways an individual can reduce their footprint.