Share.

    18 Kommentare

    1. Impressive-Dream8929 on

      I’d say with the consultants fees included that represents an outstanding use of €100,000.

    2. I love a single chair as much as the next person but would it have killed them to put a second one in a few feet away? And perhaps a bin?

    3. “We want somewhere for someone to sit while waiting for a bus, but we don’t want anyone loitering and certainly no homeless people sleeping on it”.

    4. Atreides-42 on

      No but you don’t understand, if they made a bigger, more comfortable, more useful one, a *homeless person* might be able to use it to sleep on! We can’t have people getting *use* out of our public works!!

    5. LOL I didn’t realise they weren’t even placed next to where the bus would stop, they’re at the other end of the busstop.

      „It is believed by local councillors that planning permission is not required to install a single chair.“

      „Planning“ and the pompous little bureacrats called planners have us ruined.

    6. DelGurifisu on

      You should stand at the bus stop, but if you’re ancient you can use the chair.

    7. Theelfsmother on

      Now the poors can argue over who gets the seat while nobody looks at the consultants new range rover.

    8. 21stCenturyVole on

      With this ‚hostile architecture‘ type anti-homeless designs, I’m surprised the chair didn’t come with spikes on the seat.

    9. AccordingBit7679 on

      I presumed it was a way of stopping homeless people sleeping on the benches but they won’t admit it.

    Leave A Reply