Close Menu
    Kryptowährungen

    Der US -Finanzminister Scott Bessent ausschließt neue Akquisitionen für Bitcoin Reserve aus

    Share.
    View 14 Comments

    14 Kommentare

    1. Appropriate-Talk-735 on

      I think we can see btc move down more based on this and I am ready to buy if it does.

    2. coinfeeds-bot on

      tldr; US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that the government will not acquire new Bitcoin for its strategic reserve, instead relying on confiscated assets. The current Bitcoin reserves, valued between $15 billion and $20 billion, will no longer be sold. Bessent emphasized the government’s focus on maintaining these assets as a store of value. His remarks caused Bitcoin prices to dip below $118,000. This decision reflects a cautious approach to integrating cryptocurrency into national reserves.

      *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

    3. fan_of_hakiksexydays on

      And then next week they’re gonna say „we’re buying Bitcoin again“, after the price bleeds enough from the news.

    7. Jaykalope on

      Biggest bull run catalyst just got deleted. Sorry, .gov ain’t buying your bags.

    8. mercistheman on

      I don’t think the plan was ever to purchase BTC… They said it would „not going to fish the tax payers a penny“.

    11. MariachiArchery on

      I mean… there is some good news in here, they are not going to be dumping their bags on us. That is good.

      >The United States is the largest known state holder of bitcoin in the world, estimated to hold **about 200,000 BTC**, as of March 2025.

      This is mostly confiscated funds that they have planned to sell. I’m glad they have decided not to sell it. If BTC contentious to pump, the odds they will eventually sell this reserve shrinks. Which, is good.

      This article is kind of a nothing burger.

    12. meatshoe69 on

      This seems like a bigger jump scare than PPI. But the one two punch is no bueno. Why does it feel so conveniently timed?

    Leave A Reply