Die USA werden die Sicherheitsgarantien der Ukraine unterstützen, aber keine NATO -Mitgliedschaft, sagt Macron, sagt Macron

    https://kyivindependent.com/us-will-support-ukraine-security-guarantees-but-no-nato-membership-macron-says/

    Share.

    34 Kommentare

    1. Ukraine already had security guarantees. That’s why they gave up their nuclear weapons. Don’t fall for that a second time.

    2. anything short of guaranteed US boots on the ground in significant force in event of anyone, (russia, „seperatists“ included), restarting the conflict is meaningless. it’s literally the only thing that might give them pause that is short of NATO membership, bar a combined European army being there.

    3. I bet US doesn’t want Ukraine in the EU either, so don’t be surprised if after the Friday meeting the war will still go on like nothing happened.

    4. hellranger788 on

      That LITTERALLY means nothing. There was this whole treaty about giving up nukes and getting guarantees about not getting invaded AND that if invasion happens from one party, the other party would help defend. Idk what it was called cuz clearly both the US and Russia has forgotten it.

    5. Ukraine would be such an asset to NATO yet people act like they would be purely a liability.

      They would bring the second largest army in Europe with recent battle experience vs the largest army in Europe and the reason NATO was created.

    6. US will „support“ is not worth its weight compared to NATO membership and Trump is convicted criminal.

    7. ResistiveBeaver on

      Today, sure. But what about tomorrow? Will Trump even remember what he said he will support today? Will it matter when Putin reminds him of the snuff tapes?

    8. Melbourenite1 on

      If Russia was to withdraw from Ukraine you and I and others wouldn’t be having this conversation. If Ukraine was a NATO member Russia would not have invaded and you and I and others would not be having this conversation. If Trump had half a brain and forced Putin to retreat you and I and others would never have to have this conversation again. Trump is pussy footing around because he doesn’t know what to do.

    9. Professional_Art2092 on

      The issue here is Ukraine, in theory, already HAD said protections. Fundamentally unless they’re a part of NATO Russia can and will invade again.

    10. There is no words that come out of Trump’s mouth that Ukraine can trust.

    11. I would not trust this administration even with a security guarantee that Mt. Everest will remain where it’s currently at.

    12. I wish Putin as safe presidential travel to Alaska as it was experienced by a President of Poland on his 2010 flight to Smolensk. After all both are flying a Tupolev

    13. Level_Abrocoma8925 on

      Yes yes, let’s make another Budapest memorandum. Worked so well last time. /s

    14. klautkollector on

      Good we don’t need to ethnic cleanse Europe with 20m refugees from Ukraine

    15. Gunldesnapper on

      You mean more than the security guarantees that they got when they gave up the nukes they had? Will they be more secure?

    16. Far_Out_6and_2 on

      US isn’t supporting anything Ukraine and won’t after/if a *peace* agreement comes into effect

    17. It means – we would not guarantee your safety, but you can spend money to buy our shit.

    18. abc123DohRayMe on

      We can not let Putin control the narrative. We need a man like John Kennedy to stand up to Russia. Trump is outclassed and played the fool.

    19. meowsaysdexter on

      Why would Ukraine accept security guarantees? They already have them with us and Russia. That’s why they gave up their nukes.

    20. 2Throwscrewsatit on

      A Trump security guarantee is about as trustworthy as Trump Org’s  procurement department.

    21. Do not trust a security guarantee. Ukraine had one when they gave up their nukes. They are now being invaded by the ones who promised it. 
      My security guarantee would be nato membership. What’s Russia going to do? Nuke nato? 

    22. cugeltheclever2 on

      Ukraine already has a security guarantee with America. And it turned out not to be worth the paper its written on.

    23. Utgaard_Loke on

      The orange clown will TACO and suddenly agree on everything Putler says, because he is a Ruzzian asset and the Kremlin clown is his master.

      NATO is not what it once was..EU need an army of their own that can be deployed all over the world to secure freedom and democracy.

    24. Raven_Photography on

      This is bullshit, Ukraine fell for this once before.

      The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances comprises four substantially identical political agreements signed at the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE) in Budapest, Hungary, on 5 December 1994, to provide security assurances by its signatories relating to the accession of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). The four memoranda were originally signed by four nuclear powers: Ukraine, Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom.France and China gave individual assurances in separate documents.

      Belarus is a Russian puppet state and Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014. These promises of security by the US are worthless.

    Leave A Reply