Das Geld, das Openai verdient, indem er seine gemeinnützigen Wurzeln verraten ist, ist obszön – so sehr, „uneingeschränkt durch die Notwendigkeit, finanzielle Rendite zu erzielen“.
https://futurism.com/money-openai-nonprofit-roots
Das Geld, das Openai verdient, indem er seine gemeinnützigen Wurzeln verraten ist, ist obszön – so sehr, „uneingeschränkt durch die Notwendigkeit, finanzielle Rendite zu erzielen“.
https://futurism.com/money-openai-nonprofit-roots
6 Kommentare
Submission statement: OpenAI recently did an AMA about GPT-5. A [Redditor asked for transparency on their recent attempt to ~~steal billions~~](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1mkae1l/comment/n7i5wk4/) restructure from a nonprofit to a for profit.
In unsurprising news, they didn’t respond.
Calling themselves „Open“AI really is ironic.
What’s with the weird capitalization in the title. I had to reread this to fully understand.
Maybe you should have compared the money OpenAI is making to the money OpenAI is spending before posting this.
You know, businesses don’t just collect money. They also spend.
*The money it’s raising.
They’re still not making any real money.
How much longer are we going to pretend to be surprised that OpenAI is not a non-profit org?
They now have a lot of investors who would naturally demand ROI on their investments.