Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. PressPausePlay on

      Witkoff has no experience. Really. Zero.First problem (he’s likely not aware of). Russia doesn’t occupy the totality of the oblasts….

    2. fuggitdude22 on

      Putin’s latest gambit—offering to halt the war in Ukraine if granted control over Eastern Ukraine—reads less like a peace proposal and more like a demand for territorial vindication disguised as diplomacy. This is classic Kremlin theater: dangling ceasefire talks while cementing gains on the battlefield, all under the watchful eyes of a Washington eager for an accord and a Ukraine left to wrestle with an impossible choice. Peace at the price of sovereignty? That’s not a bargain—it’s a capitulation. And as the world watches, the real question remains: will the West reward conquest or uphold principle?

    3. spinosaurs70 on

      East Ukraine as in freezing the line or in making Ukraine give up more territory?

      The first is probably the best deal we will ever get out of Russia, the second is dead on arrival in Brussels and Kiev.

    4. One-Reflection-4826 on

      and disarmament. and no nato. and no security guarantees. and the promise to get the rest gift-wrapped before 2030.

    5. Jumping-Gazelle on

      Somewhere: *Ok, I will stop stealing only if I can keep all the loot plus the rest I couldn’t take just to keep the collection complete.*

      The actual victim: *Euh, do you guys want to hear my opinion?*

    6. ptahbaphomet on

      Putin is lying, once he moves the bar and begins rebuilding troops the bar will move again. The EU knows it and once one country gives up, more attempts will be made

    7. Bad deal for Ukraine. They need a peace agreement not a ceasefire.

      1. Ukraine has major fortification lines in Donetsk. If they abandon these they leave themselves seriously exposed.
      2. A notable percent of Ukraine’s army is now unwilling conscripts. Presumably these will be allowed to return home. If war breaks out again in 1-2 years. You will not be able to round these people up quickly. So Ukraine will have a personal issue at the onset of the next war. Russia’s army is more volunteer. So if they need to mobilise for round two. They will be able to do so faster.
      3. With only a ceasefire and no peace agreement. No one will want to invest capital into Ukraine. The risk & return will not stack up. As at any point Russia can invade and you lose your capital. This is capital Ukraine desperately needs but won’t get.
      4. Russia will keep its economy on a quasi wartime footing. Accumulating a massive amount of material. They are producing 1200 isklander’s, 62,000 Geran’s, 4 million 152 mm shells a year right now. Ukraine on the other hand will produce and be gifted relatively less. They desperately need to repair their infrastructure money will be directed here not into munitions. In a couple of years there will be a massive mismatch. Russia knows exactly what it needs and at what quantity to defeat Ukraine in round 2. It will produce this.
      5. With no long term solution and a war likely in the future. Many men may leave Ukraine. Men Ukraine needs to rebuild.

    8. Rosemoorstreet on

      And then a year from now he starts all over again either there or somewhere else to gain more land with the same eventual deal. Only way I’d even half consider this is if Ukraine joins NATO

    9. Not sure how Ukraine will ever get that territory back.

      Anyways the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska has cold war vibes

    Leave A Reply