7 km breites Objekt 3L/Atlas fuhren mit 130.000 Meilen pro Stunde in Richtung des inneren Sonnensystems, wobei die Flugbahn „so präzise“ ist, dass es nur 0,0000004% der Chance gibt, dass es allein durch die Schwerkraft gezogen wird. Was machen wir davon?
Von DavidSeamanAMA
10 Kommentare
Submission statement: Harvard astrophysicist says this could be the big one. And a member of Congress sent a letter to NASA asking for the deep space Juno probe to be repurposed with tracking this… thing.
Its my fault guys I called them and told them to hurry tf up
Meh, I’m ready *shrug*
Kinetic planetary strike
You better start believing in the end times
you’re in them
We don’t make anything of it because space is fake
It’s amazing that Loeb has history for calling any rock in space an alien ship for no reason, the article has him admitting it’s a comet & his colleagues quoted seemingly annoyed at suggestions claiming otherwise
Yet it’s being plastered around the world as fact
Someone, for some reason, is trying to condition humans into expecting an event
Perhaps the alternative is that someone’s reason is to make the UAP topic so mind numbingly boring, silly & unfulfilling that the general public don’t have an appetite for disclosure
Whomever it is, I hope they take me with them.
Don’t Look Up
What’s the difference between a „so precise“ trajectory vs a random one?
So I read the actual report by Avi Loeb and it’s rather disappointing. The entire report is geared towards convincing people that this is a Hostile Alien Probe heading to Earth. However when you get to the very last page of the report the last paragraph explains how they know for a fact that this is a comet, but they are using the ‚Hostile Alien Probe‘ as nothing more than a thought experiment for future encounters and that we need to be prepared if indeed one day that were to happen.
I was so angry when I read the report for myself. I’m sure he’s just looking for extra funding and using this as an excuse.