Share.

    28 Kommentare

    1. MrKillaMidnight on

      “The U.S. only added 19,000 jobs in May compared to an initial report of 144,000, and only 14,000 in June after an initial report of 147,000, according to The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)“

      That is *quite* the revision

    2. So you’re saying the 73,000 added today is actually negative 53,000 jobs?

    3. Just_the_nicest_guy on

      So far in 6 months adjustments total -461,000 jobs*

      And for the „this is normal“ people: In four years under Biden adjustments totaled +1,237,000 jobs.

      **June number is not final*

    4. Accurate-Guava-3337 on

      Read this and told myself not to look at the market, then of course immediately did not take that advice.

      Dumpy is going to REALLY lose his shit on Powell since he was right, per usual.

    5. Searchlights on

      The May and June numbers were „revised“ down 86.8% and 90.5%, respectively.

      When does it stop being a revision and begin being you-lied-in-the-first-place? I can’t think of any reason to trust Federal data controlled by Trump.

      MAGA will say whatever helps them and distort reality later. The chocolate ration has actually gone up!

    6. ResidentKelpien on

      From another source:

      >Courtesy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the new data shows that job numbers in the previous month — June — had to be revised from originalyl projected job growth of 147,000 new jobs to a staggeringly low 14,000, which Egan noted was “the weakest month of job growth since December of 2020 during COVID.”

      [CNN stunned as awful Trump job figures show weakest month since height of Covid – Raw Story](https://www.rawstory.com/economy-2673798475/)

      Trump proves that the pandemic is not the reason or excuse for failure of his economic policies.

    7. Well, but Trump and his entire family, as well as employees such as Lutnick and Bessent, will certainly have increased their wealth considerably in the last six months, and that is all that matters to Trump and his employees.

    8. Also, what counts as a job these days includes thousands of gig economy jobs that don’t cover the cost of living. Unemployment numbers will look low, but it’s hiding real economic problems.

    9. LivingIntelligent968 on

      And he calls the federal reserve a bunch of morons. This is why they haven’t dropped interest rates yet because they know the negative effects of the current administration’s decisions. He will ruin the US but tell his supporters everything is just beautiful.

    10. astrozombie2012 on

      Just remember. Things are really bad… but they’re going to get way worse

    11. Key_Solid_1696 on

      The question is whether we can trust any numbers coming from this administration. I actually expect them to fudge numbers to get their desired outcome, in this case lower interest rates.

    12. J-the-Kidder on

      You mean to tell me the government under this administration would lie to the people and industry!? No. I refuse to believe that. After all, promises made, promises kept.

    13. I need economic journalists to stop reporting this administration’s labor numbers as if they’re correct or trustworthy. They aren’t reliable. That’s the story. It’s very clear the US has been losing jobs – which will probably be apparent when the July numbers are revised 1-2 months from now.

    14. I am a little bit encouraged that they let these revisions get published. BLS is part of the executive branch.

    15. remember how much he talked about these revisions during the Biden years when he whines that they are “lying” now.

    16. Pardon my naivety, but with schools out and hundreds of thousands of people want to do short term work, aren’t summer months usually good for the labor market?

    17. The current government lied?!?

      I am shocked. Shocked I say, I cannot fathom that this administration would lie or doctor data to hide the actual consequences of their economic “policy”.

      It boggles the mind.

    18. pagerussell on

      [https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/08/01/multimedia/2025-08-01-july-jobs-promo-index/2025-08-01-july-jobs-promo-index-threeByTwoSmallAt2X-v6.png?format=pjpg&quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale](https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/08/01/multimedia/2025-08-01-july-jobs-promo-index/2025-08-01-july-jobs-promo-index-threeByTwoSmallAt2X-v6.png?format=pjpg&quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale)

      Look at that image. And tell me you think the July number is accurate, too No, I bet money the July number gets revised down and is ultimately negative.

      We are already in a recession. But this time, we don’t have anyone with brains or maturity in the drivers seat to get us out. Guaranteed, whatever the worst move will be during a recession, he’ll make it.

    19. They put out false numbers to be highlighted by news organizations, then the actual numbers come out with little fanfare, similar to retractions. It’s all playing games and being dishonest with the American public.

    20. Ozymandias12 on

      The worst job market since 2020. Trump took what was record job creation under the Biden admin and reversed that trend in less than 6 months. Impressive really.

    21. SebasChan_Trades_jp on

      258k fewer jobs than reported? That’s not a revision — that’s rewriting history. Is this soft economic data just political cover to push Powell into rate cuts? What are people actually feeling out there?

    22. A -88.66% revision! Wtf are they doing at the BLS. It’s like inflation numbers are being made up as well since data started getting suppressed in May.

    23. Flat-Emergency4891 on

      What a fucking joke. The original numbers were bad, so Trump fired the head of labor statistics and then released more favorable numbers.

      Don’t believe your eyes or your ears. Believe Dear Leader.

    24. There’s no fucking way that orange senile demented fat fuck fingers didn’t pressure the BLS into making those original numbers up. This isn’t a small rounding error. This is a massive fucking „mistake“ for two straight months.

    Leave A Reply