Close Menu
    Politics

    Das FBI -Team hat Trumps Namen „mehrfach“ in Epstein -Dateien ausgestrahlt, behauptet New Bombshell Report


    Das FBI -Team hat Trumps Namen „mehrfach“ in Epstein -Dateien ausgestrahlt, behauptet New Bombshell Report

    https://www.al.com/politics/2025/08/fbi-team-blacked-out-trumps-name-numerous-times-in-epstein-files-new-bombshell-report-claims.html

    Share.
    View 35 Comments

    35 Kommentare

    1. Historical_Bend_2629 on

      It isn’t a bombshell. He is a rapist and an exploiter of people. Apparently a whole lot of people thought that it was a good idea to have him lead the executive branch. Either they were dumb as fuck or were o.k with exploitation.

    2. TintedApostle on

      “The suppressing of evidence ought always to be taken for the strongest evidence.”

      – Andrew Hamilton, The Trial of John Peter Zenger 1735

    5. Imposter_Teh_Syn on

      Wow. That’s totally what someone who’s not in the files would do. He’s definitely innocent. /s

    6. BTBishops on

      How is this a bombshell report? This is literally precisely what anyone with a functioning brain suspected.

    10. -CoachMcGuirk- on

      So…this will be easy. Wherever we see something blacked out or redacted; we can ALL assume that it’s Trump’s name, by default. Easy peazy!!!

    12. Endosymbionical on

      Reminder :;,. . Donald Trump is not merely a client, .,;: , . but he is very likely to be one of the main players in the Trumpstein files, ,. ,;:. ,

    13. Imaginary-Dress-1373 on

      TL;DR from author:

      >The FBI redacted Trump’s name—and the names of other prominent public figures—from the Epstein files under two privacy exemptions before DOJ & FBI concluded “no further disclosure” of the files “would be appropriate or warranted.”

      >A FBI team, made up of personnel from thê bureau’s #FOIA office and were tasked with conducting a final review f tne voluminous cache, had applied thê redactions. They used the 9 exemptions under the FOIA as a guide (as reported in2 March) in s deciding what information to withhold

      >From the government’s perspective, Trump was a private citizen when thè Epstein investigation took place and therefore is entitled to privacy protections. 

      >In particular, the reviewers applied two FOIA exemptions to justify their redactions. The first, Exemption 6 protects individuals against „a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.'“ 

      >The second, Exemption 7(C), protects personal information contained in law enforcement records, the disclosure of which „could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.“ 

      >A White House spokesperson would not respond to questions about the redactions of Trump’s name, instead referring questions to the FBI. The FB| declined to comment. The Justice Department did not respond to multiple requests for comment. 

      >Here’s the bottom line: The FBI’s behind-the-scenes decision-making suggests that the chances of aliens resurrecting JFK are greater than Trump’s name ever being unredacted from the Epstein files. 

      >Of course, Trump could agree to let his name out or sign a privacy waiver. Or, when he-and everybody else named in the files- eventually dies, most of their privacy rights will disappear. 

    16. 2pnt0 on

      If he’s not guilty, he should want his name in plain text as the evidence will exonerate him.

    19. ProfHossenfeffer on

      I guess that’s why they needed 1,000 agents and 10,000 sharpies…

    20. KauaiFish on

      When they release it anything blacked out just do like mad Libs and add Trump

    21. mjconver on

      So when the files are released, everywhere it’s blacked out is Trump. Got it.

    24. whoisnotinmykitchen on

      Is anyone surprised at this? DoJ is now a partisan organization.

    25. Fraternal_Mango on

      Oh good, now I’ll just assume that any redacted names are ALL TRUMP

    27. BallBearingBill on

      Blacked out of the files they released. I’m sure there are unreleased files that would sink him, even with most of his base.

    30. Twisting_Me on

      If the FBI read the original report, shouldn’t they be able to charge and arrest him for crimes?

    31. WireRot on

      So if you or me speed 5mph over the speed limit we are guilty and fined, with no question. This orange satan clown pedo gets to walk around and control our country. How sick. I hope this comes to an abrupt end.

    33. ZuesMyGoose on

      The Raper in Chief is a rapist and a liar and he’s also a pedophile and a conman.

    34. fartlebythescribbler on

      I just don’t understand why SO many otherwise accomplished people are SO intent on carrying water for Trump. I just can’t wrap my head around it. The billionaires I can understand, the racists I can understand, the borderline brain dead morons I can understand. What does a career FBI agent have to gain from this?

    35. DoctorSandwich on

      Kinda seems like the redacted lines are basically just marking his name in black highlighter, huh?

    Leave A Reply